Re: [PATH 6.1.y 0/5] Backport "sched cpuset: Bring back cpuset_mutex"

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 06:13:01PM +0000, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When using KVM on systems that require iTLB multihit mitigation enabled[1],
> we're observing very high latency (70ms+) in KVM_CREATE_VM ioctl() in 6.1
> kernel in comparison to older stable kernels such as 5.10. This is true even
> when using favordynmods mount option.
> 
> We debugged this down to the cpuset controller trying to acquire cpuset_rwsem
> in cpuset_can_attach(). This happens because KVM creates a worker thread which
> calls cgroup_attach_task_all() during KVM_CREATE_VM. I don't know if
> favordynmods is supposed to cover this case or not, but removing cpuset_rwsem
> certainly solves the issue.
> 
> For the backport I tried to pick as many dependent commits as required to avoid
> conflicts. I would highly appreciate review from cgroup people.
> 
> Tests performed:
>  * Measured latency in KVM_CREATE_VM ioctl(), it goes down to less than 1ms
>  * Ran the cgroup kselftest tests, got same results with or without this series
>     * However, some tests such as test_memcontrol and test_kmem are failing
>       in 6.1. This probably needs to be looked at
>     * To make test_cpuset_prs.sh work, I had to increase the timeout on line
>       592 to 1 second. With this change, the test runs and passes
>  * I run our downstream test suite against our downstream 6.1 kernel with this
>    series applied, it passed
> 
>  [1] For the case where the CPU is not vulnerable to iTLB multihit we can
>      simply disable the iTLB multihit mitigation in KVM which avoids this
>      whole situation. Disabling the mitigation is possible since upstream
>      commit 0b210faf337 which I plan to backport soon

Please try 6.1.50, I think you will find that this issue is resolved
there, right?

if not, please rebase your series on top of that, as obviously, it does
not still apply anymore.

thanks,

greg k-h