[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/3] ACPICA: Add AML_NO_OPERAND_RESOLVE flag to Timer

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/3] ACPICA: Add AML_NO_OPERAND_RESOLVE flag to Timer

[Sasha Levin]

From: Abhishek Mainkar <abmainkar@nvidia.com>

[ Upstream commit 3a21ffdbc825e0919db9da0e27ee5ff2cc8a863e ]

ACPICA commit 90310989a0790032f5a0140741ff09b545af4bc5

According to the ACPI specification 19.6.134, no argument is required to be passed for ASL Timer instruction. For taking care of no argument, AML_NO_OPERAND_RESOLVE flag is added to ASL Timer instruction opcode.

When ASL timer instruction interpreted by ACPI interpreter, getting error. After adding AML_NO_OPERAND_RESOLVE flag to ASL Timer instruction opcode, issue is not observed.

=============================================================
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in acpica/dswexec.c:401:12 index -1 is out of range for type 'union acpi_operand_object *[9]'
CPU: 37 PID: 1678 Comm: cat Not tainted
6.0.0-dev-th500-6.0.y-1+bcf8c46459e407-generic-64k
HW name: NVIDIA BIOS v1.1.1-d7acbfc-dirty 12/19/2022 Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0xe0/0x130
 show_stack+0x20/0x60
 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
 dump_stack+0x18/0x34
 ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x50
 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x80/0x90
 acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x1bc/0x6d8
 acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x57c/0x618
 acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x1e0/0x4b4
 acpi_ps_execute_method+0x24c/0x2b8
 acpi_ns_evaluate+0x3a8/0x4bc
 acpi_evaluate_object+0x15c/0x37c
 acpi_evaluate_integer+0x54/0x15c
 show_power+0x8c/0x12c [acpi_power_meter]

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/90310989
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Mainkar <abmainkar@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/psopcode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psopcode.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psopcode.c
index 8d7dc98bad17b..ca01e02af9cba 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psopcode.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psopcode.c
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ const struct acpi_opcode_info acpi_gbl_aml_op_info[AML_NUM_OPCODES] = {
 
 /* 7E */ ACPI_OP("Timer", ARGP_TIMER_OP, ARGI_TIMER_OP, ACPI_TYPE_ANY,
 			 AML_CLASS_EXECUTE, AML_TYPE_EXEC_0A_0T_1R,
-			 AML_FLAGS_EXEC_0A_0T_1R),
+			 AML_FLAGS_EXEC_0A_0T_1R | AML_NO_OPERAND_RESOLVE),
 
 /* ACPI 5.0 opcodes */
 
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 2/3] ACPI: video: Add backlight=native DMI quirk for Lenovo Ideapad Z470

[Sasha Levin]

From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 96b709be183c56293933ef45b8b75f8af268c6de ]

The Lenovo Ideapad Z470 predates Windows 8, so it defaults to using
acpi_video for backlight control. But this is not functional on this
model.

Add a DMI quirk to use the native backlight interface which works.

Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208724
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index b4f16073ef432..866bc20c82397 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -294,6 +294,15 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
 		DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Lenovo IdeaPad S405"),
 		},
 	},
+	{
+	 /* https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208724 */
+	 .callback = video_detect_force_native,
+	 /* Lenovo Ideapad Z470 */
+	 .matches = {
+		DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
+		DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "IdeaPad Z470"),
+		},
+	},
 	{
 	 /* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187004 */
 	 .callback = video_detect_force_native,
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/3] hw_breakpoint: fix single-stepping when using bpf_overflow_handler

[Sasha Levin]

From: Tomislav Novak <tnovak@meta.com>

[ Upstream commit d11a69873d9a7435fe6a48531e165ab80a8b1221 ]

Arm platforms use is_default_overflow_handler() to determine if the
hw_breakpoint code should single-step over the breakpoint trigger or
let the custom handler deal with it.

Since bpf_overflow_handler() currently isn't recognized as a default
handler, attaching a BPF program to a PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT event causes
it to keep firing (the instruction triggering the data abort exception
is never skipped). For example:

  # bpftrace -e 'watchpoint:0x10000:4:w { print("hit") }' -c ./test
  Attaching 1 probe...
  hit
  hit
  [...]
  ^C

(./test performs a single 4-byte store to 0x10000)

This patch replaces the check with uses_default_overflow_handler(),
which accounts for the bpf_overflow_handler() case by also testing
if one of the perf_event_output functions gets invoked indirectly,
via orig_default_handler.

Signed-off-by: Tomislav Novak <tnovak@meta.com>
Tested-by: Samuel Gosselin <sgosselin@google.com> # arm64
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220923203644.2731604-1-tnovak@fb.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605191923.1219974-1-tnovak@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c   |  8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c |  4 ++--
 include/linux/perf_event.h        | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 2ee5b7f5e7ad0..c71ecd06131ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
 	hw->address &= ~alignment_mask;
 	hw->ctrl.len <<= offset;
 
-	if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp)) {
+	if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp)) {
 		/*
 		 * Mismatch breakpoints are required for single-stepping
 		 * breakpoints.
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
 		 * Otherwise, insert a temporary mismatch breakpoint so that
 		 * we can single-step over the watchpoint trigger.
 		 */
-		if (!is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
+		if (!uses_default_overflow_handler(wp))
 			continue;
 step:
 		enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
 		info->trigger = addr;
 		pr_debug("watchpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", info->trigger);
 		perf_bp_event(wp, regs);
-		if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
+		if (uses_default_overflow_handler(wp))
 			enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
 	}
 
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			info->trigger = addr;
 			pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
 			perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
-			if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
+			if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp))
 				enable_single_step(bp, addr);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 9f105fe58595d..5d120e39bf61a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ static int breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned int esr,
 		perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
 
 		/* Do we need to handle the stepping? */
-		if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
+		if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp))
 			step = 1;
 unlock:
 		rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static u64 get_distance_from_watchpoint(unsigned long addr, u64 val,
 static int watchpoint_report(struct perf_event *wp, unsigned long addr,
 			     struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	int step = is_default_overflow_handler(wp);
+	int step = uses_default_overflow_handler(wp);
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(wp);
 
 	info->trigger = addr;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index efe30b9b11908..f17e08bd294c2 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -998,15 +998,31 @@ extern void perf_event_output(struct perf_event *event,
 			      struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 static inline bool
-is_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
+__is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler)
 {
-	if (likely(event->overflow_handler == perf_event_output_forward))
+	if (likely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_forward))
 		return true;
-	if (unlikely(event->overflow_handler == perf_event_output_backward))
+	if (unlikely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_backward))
 		return true;
 	return false;
 }
 
+#define is_default_overflow_handler(event) \
+	__is_default_overflow_handler((event)->overflow_handler)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+static inline bool uses_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	if (likely(is_default_overflow_handler(event)))
+		return true;
+
+	return __is_default_overflow_handler(event->orig_overflow_handler);
+}
+#else
+#define uses_default_overflow_handler(event) \
+	is_default_overflow_handler(event)
+#endif
+
 extern void
 perf_event_header__init_id(struct perf_event_header *header,
 			   struct perf_sample_data *data,
-- 
2.40.1