From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79307CA5506 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238745AbjIMILM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:11:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34908 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238814AbjIMILF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:11:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374C219A7 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 01:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54FC5C433C9; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:11:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1694592660; bh=cg+WWG8RtF6KxSWA1DTAzKeZhIuV4osQy0b+PdMiuj0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2E58EBr7G5LbBu3shdoNq2V5XECpErF2Mdrb1R23Ku4OBYCKVh41vf/0CAXAJ3OOT /gjxW/bp/cbGckoyx238vWvCmICQPm2G741r2ONZvy3wbaoyDrPPjYfIbb6xbdzAw8 9wy5WfrJ4+I+s44nhzmNzqatPLe1jbY7/+6bLCd8= Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:10:57 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Quan Tian Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IPv6 traffic distribution problem with OVS group on 6.5 Message-ID: <2023091347-aspirin-lilac-6536@gregkh> References: <20230913065407.GA510095@bm02> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230913065407.GA510095@bm02> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 06:54:07AM +0000, Quan Tian wrote: > Hi, > > We found that OVS group always selected the same bucket for different L4 > flows between two given IPv6 addresses on 6.5. It was because commit > e069ba07e6c7 ("net: openvswitch: add support for l4 symmetric hashing") > introduced support for symmetric hashing and used the flow dissector, > which had a problem that it didn't incorporate transport ports when > flow label is present in IPv6 header. The bug is fixed by this commit: > > a5e2151ff9d5 ("net/ipv6: SKB symmetric hash should incorporate transport ports") > > Could you please backport it to 6.5.y? > > Issue: https://github.com/antrea-io/antrea/issues/5457 Sure, now queued up. greg k-h