Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ritesh.list@gmail.com, enwlinux@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: don't use CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN for non-regular files" failed to apply to 6.5-stable tree
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:15:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023091649-ember-remindful-28e0@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 6.5-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.5.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 772c9f691dcf3a487f29ddb90a5a15c78d7328e1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023091649-ember-remindful-28e0@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.5.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

772c9f691dcf ("ext4: don't use CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN for non-regular files")
b50675a4a6a6 ("ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 772c9f691dcf3a487f29ddb90a5a15c78d7328e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:33:34 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: don't use CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN for non-regular files

Using CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN only make sense for regular files, as for
non-regular files we never normalize the allocation request length i.e.
goal len is same as original length (ac_g_ex.fe_len == ac_o_ex.fe_len).

Hence there is no scope of trimming the goal length to make it
satisfy original request len. Thus this patch avoids using
CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN criteria for non-regular files request.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 33122aa930f1 ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)")
Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2a694c748ff8b8c4b416995a24f06f07b55047a8.1689516047.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index b89b5f0816e7..3d5b0b71d7f5 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -966,7 +966,18 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context *
 		}
 	}
 
-	*new_cr = CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN;
+	/*
+	 * CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN works based on the concept that we have
+	 * a larger normalized goal len request which can be trimmed to
+	 * a smaller goal len such that it can still satisfy original
+	 * request len. However, allocation request for non-regular
+	 * files never gets normalized.
+	 * See function ext4_mb_normalize_request() (EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA).
+	 */
+	if (ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA)
+		*new_cr = CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN;
+	else
+		*new_cr = CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW;
 }
 
 /*


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-09-16 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023091649-ember-remindful-28e0@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox