From: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4.y] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fix ECC level field setting for v7.2 controller
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:20:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919222035.225613-1-william.zhang@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023091633-negative-unashamed-87b9@gregkh>
v7.2 controller has different ECC level field size and shift in the acc
control register than its predecessor and successor controller. It needs
to be set specifically.
Fixes: decba6d47869 ("mtd: brcmnand: Add v7.2 controller support")
Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230706182909.79151-2-william.zhang@broadcom.com
(cherry picked from commit 2ec2839a9062db8a592525a3fdabd42dcd9a3a9b)
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 74 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
index bd9f45edc9a3..a6f5706d2745 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ struct brcmnand_controller {
unsigned int max_page_size;
const unsigned int *page_sizes;
unsigned int max_oob;
+ u32 ecc_level_shift;
u32 features;
/* for low-power standby/resume only */
@@ -487,6 +488,34 @@ enum {
INTFC_CTLR_READY = BIT(31),
};
+/***********************************************************************
+ * NAND ACC CONTROL bitfield
+ *
+ * Some bits have remained constant throughout hardware revision, while
+ * others have shifted around.
+ ***********************************************************************/
+
+/* Constant for all versions (where supported) */
+enum {
+ /* See BRCMNAND_HAS_CACHE_MODE */
+ ACC_CONTROL_CACHE_MODE = BIT(22),
+
+ /* See BRCMNAND_HAS_PREFETCH */
+ ACC_CONTROL_PREFETCH = BIT(23),
+
+ ACC_CONTROL_PAGE_HIT = BIT(24),
+ ACC_CONTROL_WR_PREEMPT = BIT(25),
+ ACC_CONTROL_PARTIAL_PAGE = BIT(26),
+ ACC_CONTROL_RD_ERASED = BIT(27),
+ ACC_CONTROL_FAST_PGM_RDIN = BIT(28),
+ ACC_CONTROL_WR_ECC = BIT(30),
+ ACC_CONTROL_RD_ECC = BIT(31),
+};
+
+#define ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT 16
+/* Only for v7.2 */
+#define ACC_CONTROL_ECC_EXT_SHIFT 13
+
static inline u32 nand_readreg(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl, u32 offs)
{
return brcmnand_readl(ctrl->nand_base + offs);
@@ -590,6 +619,12 @@ static int brcmnand_revision_init(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
else if (of_property_read_bool(ctrl->dev->of_node, "brcm,nand-has-wp"))
ctrl->features |= BRCMNAND_HAS_WP;
+ /* v7.2 has different ecc level shift in the acc register */
+ if (ctrl->nand_version == 0x0702)
+ ctrl->ecc_level_shift = ACC_CONTROL_ECC_EXT_SHIFT;
+ else
+ ctrl->ecc_level_shift = ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -752,30 +787,6 @@ static inline int brcmnand_cmd_shift(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
return 0;
}
-/***********************************************************************
- * NAND ACC CONTROL bitfield
- *
- * Some bits have remained constant throughout hardware revision, while
- * others have shifted around.
- ***********************************************************************/
-
-/* Constant for all versions (where supported) */
-enum {
- /* See BRCMNAND_HAS_CACHE_MODE */
- ACC_CONTROL_CACHE_MODE = BIT(22),
-
- /* See BRCMNAND_HAS_PREFETCH */
- ACC_CONTROL_PREFETCH = BIT(23),
-
- ACC_CONTROL_PAGE_HIT = BIT(24),
- ACC_CONTROL_WR_PREEMPT = BIT(25),
- ACC_CONTROL_PARTIAL_PAGE = BIT(26),
- ACC_CONTROL_RD_ERASED = BIT(27),
- ACC_CONTROL_FAST_PGM_RDIN = BIT(28),
- ACC_CONTROL_WR_ECC = BIT(30),
- ACC_CONTROL_RD_ECC = BIT(31),
-};
-
static inline u32 brcmnand_spare_area_mask(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
{
if (ctrl->nand_version == 0x0702)
@@ -786,18 +797,15 @@ static inline u32 brcmnand_spare_area_mask(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
return GENMASK(5, 0);
}
-#define NAND_ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT 16
-#define NAND_ACC_CONTROL_ECC_EXT_SHIFT 13
-
static inline u32 brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
{
u32 mask = (ctrl->nand_version >= 0x0600) ? 0x1f : 0x0f;
- mask <<= NAND_ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT;
+ mask <<= ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT;
/* v7.2 includes additional ECC levels */
- if (ctrl->nand_version >= 0x0702)
- mask |= 0x7 << NAND_ACC_CONTROL_ECC_EXT_SHIFT;
+ if (ctrl->nand_version == 0x0702)
+ mask |= 0x7 << ACC_CONTROL_ECC_EXT_SHIFT;
return mask;
}
@@ -811,8 +819,8 @@ static void brcmnand_set_ecc_enabled(struct brcmnand_host *host, int en)
if (en) {
acc_control |= ecc_flags; /* enable RD/WR ECC */
- acc_control |= host->hwcfg.ecc_level
- << NAND_ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT;
+ acc_control &= ~brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(ctrl);
+ acc_control |= host->hwcfg.ecc_level << ctrl->ecc_level_shift;
} else {
acc_control &= ~ecc_flags; /* disable RD/WR ECC */
acc_control &= ~brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(ctrl);
@@ -2161,7 +2169,7 @@ static int brcmnand_set_cfg(struct brcmnand_host *host,
tmp = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs);
tmp &= ~brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(ctrl);
- tmp |= cfg->ecc_level << NAND_ACC_CONTROL_ECC_SHIFT;
+ tmp |= cfg->ecc_level << ctrl->ecc_level_shift;
tmp &= ~brcmnand_spare_area_mask(ctrl);
tmp |= cfg->spare_area_size;
nand_writereg(ctrl, acc_control_offs, tmp);
--
2.37.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-16 12:23 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Fix ECC level field setting for v7.2" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh
2023-09-19 22:20 ` William Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919222035.225613-1-william.zhang@broadcom.com \
--to=william.zhang@broadcom.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox