public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	adobriyan@gmail.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com,
	Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 5.10.y] proc: fix a dentry lock race between release_task and lookup
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:11:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023092048-posting-unlit-4734@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919233335.170835-1-surajjs@amazon.com>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:33:35PM -0700, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
> From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> 
> commit d919a1e79bac890421537cf02ae773007bf55e6b upstream.
> 
> Commit 7bc3e6e55acf06 ("proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc")
> moved proc_flush_task() behind __exit_signal().  Then, process systemd can
> take long period high cpu usage during releasing task in following
> concurrent processes:
> 
>   systemd                                 ps
> kernel_waitid                 stat(/proc/tgid)
>   do_wait                       filename_lookup
>     wait_consider_task            lookup_fast
>       release_task
>         __exit_signal
>           __unhash_process
>             detach_pid
>               __change_pid // remove task->pid_links
>                                      d_revalidate -> pid_revalidate  // 0
>                                      d_invalidate(/proc/tgid)
>                                        shrink_dcache_parent(/proc/tgid)
>                                          d_walk(/proc/tgid)
>                                            spin_lock_nested(/proc/tgid/fd)
>                                            // iterating opened fd
>         proc_flush_pid                                    |
>            d_invalidate (/proc/tgid/fd)                   |
>               shrink_dcache_parent(/proc/tgid/fd)         |
>                 shrink_dentry_list(subdirs)               ↓
>                   shrink_lock_dentry(/proc/tgid/fd) --> race on dentry lock
> 
> Function d_invalidate() will remove dentry from hash firstly, but why does
> proc_flush_pid() process dentry '/proc/tgid/fd' before dentry
> '/proc/tgid'?  That's because proc_pid_make_inode() adds proc inode in
> reverse order by invoking hlist_add_head_rcu().  But proc should not add
> any inodes under '/proc/tgid' except '/proc/tgid/task/pid', fix it by
> adding inode into 'pid->inodes' only if the inode is /proc/tgid or
> /proc/tgid/task/pid.
> 
> Performance regression:
> Create 200 tasks, each task open one file for 50,000 times. Kill all
> tasks when opened files exceed 10,000,000 (cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr).
> 
> Before fix:
> $ time killall -wq aa
>   real    4m40.946s   # During this period, we can see 'ps' and 'systemd'
> 			taking high cpu usage.
> 
> After fix:
> $ time killall -wq aa
>   real    1m20.732s   # During this period, we can see 'systemd' taking
> 			high cpu usage.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220713130029.4133533-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
> Fixes: 7bc3e6e55acf06 ("proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc")
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216054
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> [ bp: Context adjustments ]
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>

both now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-20 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19 23:33 [PATCH stable 5.10.y] proc: fix a dentry lock race between release_task and lookup Suraj Jitindar Singh
2023-09-20 11:11 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023092048-posting-unlit-4734@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surajjs@amazon.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox