From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Saranya Muruganandam <saranyamohan@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhang Wensheng <zhangwensheng@huaweicloud.com>,
Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@huawei.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix use-after-free of q->q_usage_counter
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:26:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023092258-clothing-passerby-e0f2@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921182012.3965572-1-saranyamohan@google.com>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:20:12AM -0700, Saranya Muruganandam wrote:
> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>
> commit d36a9ea5e7766961e753ee38d4c331bbe6ef659b upstream.
>
> For blk-mq, queue release handler is usually called after
> blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() returns. However, the
> q_usage_counter->release() handler may not be run yet at that time, so
> this can cause a use-after-free.
>
> Fix the issue by moving percpu_ref_exit() into blk_free_queue_rcu().
> Since ->release() is called with rcu read lock held, it is agreed that
> the race should be covered in caller per discussion from the two links.
>
> Backport-notes: Not a clean cherry-pick since a lot has changed,
> however essentially the same fix.
>
> Reported-by: Zhang Wensheng <zhangwensheng@huaweicloud.com>
> Reported-by: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@huawei.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Y5prfOjyyjQKUrtH@T590/T/#u
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y4%2FmzMd4evRg9yDi@fedora/
> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcf ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path")
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215021629.74870-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Saranya Muruganandam <saranyamohan@google.com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 2 --
> block/blk-sysfs.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
What stable kernel(s) are you expecting this backport to be applied to?
thanks,
greg "not a mind reader" k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-21 18:20 [PATCH] block: fix use-after-free of q->q_usage_counter Saranya Muruganandam
2023-09-21 20:32 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-22 1:09 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-22 9:26 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-09-22 18:21 ` Saranya Muruganandam
2023-10-07 10:22 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023092258-clothing-passerby-e0f2@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=saranyamohan@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangwensheng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=zhongjinghua@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox