stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 1/6] Revert "NFS: More fixes for nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (13 more replies)
  0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
	shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.1.58-rc1

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages()

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "NFS: More O_DIRECT accounting fixes for error paths"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "NFS: Use the correct commit info in nfs_join_page_group()"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "NFS: More fixes for nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io()"


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                 |   4 +-
 fs/nfs/direct.c          | 134 +++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 fs/nfs/write.c           |  23 ++++----
 include/linux/nfs_page.h |   4 +-
 lib/test_meminit.c       |   2 +-
 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1 1/6] Revert "NFS: More fixes for nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io()"
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 2/6] Revert "NFS: Use the correct commit info in nfs_join_page_group()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, poester, Daniel Díaz,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Sasha Levin

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit edd1f06145101dab83497806bb6162641255ef50 which is
commit b11243f720ee5f9376861099019c8542969b6318 upstream.

There are reported NFS problems in the 6.1.56 release, so revert a set
of NFS patches to hopefully resolve the issue.

Reported-by: poester <poester@internetbrands.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012165439.137237-2-kernel@linuxace.com
Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2023100755-livestock-barcode-fe41@gregkh
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c |   17 ++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -782,23 +782,18 @@ static void nfs_write_sync_pgio_error(st
 static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
 {
 	struct nfs_direct_req *dreq = hdr->dreq;
-	struct nfs_page *req;
-	struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
 
 	trace_nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io(dreq);
 
-	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
 	spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
-	if (dreq->error == 0)
+	if (dreq->error == 0) {
 		dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
-	set_bit(NFS_IOHDR_REDO, &hdr->flags);
-	spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
-	while (!list_empty(&hdr->pages)) {
-		req = nfs_list_entry(hdr->pages.next);
-		nfs_list_remove_request(req);
-		nfs_unlock_request(req);
-		nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
+		/* fake unstable write to let common nfs resend pages */
+		hdr->verf.committed = NFS_UNSTABLE;
+		hdr->good_bytes = hdr->args.offset + hdr->args.count -
+			hdr->io_start;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
 }
 
 static const struct nfs_pgio_completion_ops nfs_direct_write_completion_ops = {



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1 2/6] Revert "NFS: Use the correct commit info in nfs_join_page_group()"
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 1/6] Revert "NFS: More fixes for nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 3/6] Revert "NFS: More O_DIRECT accounting fixes for error paths" Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, poester, Daniel Díaz,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Sasha Levin

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit d4729af1c73cfacb64facda3d196e25940f0e7a5 which is
commit b193a78ddb5ee7dba074d3f28dc050069ba083c0 upstream.

There are reported NFS problems in the 6.1.56 release, so revert a set
of NFS patches to hopefully resolve the issue.

Reported-by: poester <poester@internetbrands.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012165439.137237-2-kernel@linuxace.com
Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2023100755-livestock-barcode-fe41@gregkh
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c          |    8 +++-----
 fs/nfs/write.c           |   23 +++++++++++------------
 include/linux/nfs_page.h |    4 +---
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -500,9 +500,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_add_page_head(str
 	kref_get(&head->wb_kref);
 }
 
-static void nfs_direct_join_group(struct list_head *list,
-				  struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
-				  struct inode *inode)
+static void nfs_direct_join_group(struct list_head *list, struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct nfs_page *req, *subreq;
 
@@ -524,7 +522,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_join_group(struct
 				nfs_release_request(subreq);
 			}
 		} while ((subreq = subreq->wb_this_page) != req);
-		nfs_join_page_group(req, cinfo, inode);
+		nfs_join_page_group(req, inode);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -549,7 +547,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(
 	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
 	nfs_direct_write_scan_commit_list(dreq->inode, &reqs, &cinfo);
 
-	nfs_direct_join_group(&reqs, &cinfo, dreq->inode);
+	nfs_direct_join_group(&reqs, dreq->inode);
 
 	nfs_clear_pnfs_ds_commit_verifiers(&dreq->ds_cinfo);
 	get_dreq(dreq);
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ static const struct nfs_pgio_completion_
 static const struct nfs_commit_completion_ops nfs_commit_completion_ops;
 static const struct nfs_rw_ops nfs_rw_write_ops;
 static void nfs_inode_remove_request(struct nfs_page *req);
-static void nfs_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
-				     struct nfs_page *req);
+static void nfs_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_page *req);
 static void nfs_init_cinfo_from_inode(struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
 				      struct inode *inode);
 static struct nfs_page *
@@ -503,8 +502,8 @@ nfs_destroy_unlinked_subrequests(struct
  * the (former) group.  All subrequests are removed from any write or commit
  * lists, unlinked from the group and destroyed.
  */
-void nfs_join_page_group(struct nfs_page *head, struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
-			 struct inode *inode)
+void
+nfs_join_page_group(struct nfs_page *head, struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct nfs_page *subreq;
 	struct nfs_page *destroy_list = NULL;
@@ -534,7 +533,7 @@ void nfs_join_page_group(struct nfs_page
 	 * Commit list removal accounting is done after locks are dropped */
 	subreq = head;
 	do {
-		nfs_clear_request_commit(cinfo, subreq);
+		nfs_clear_request_commit(subreq);
 		subreq = subreq->wb_this_page;
 	} while (subreq != head);
 
@@ -568,10 +567,8 @@ nfs_lock_and_join_requests(struct page *
 {
 	struct inode *inode = page_file_mapping(page)->host;
 	struct nfs_page *head;
-	struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
 	int ret;
 
-	nfs_init_cinfo_from_inode(&cinfo, inode);
 	/*
 	 * A reference is taken only on the head request which acts as a
 	 * reference to the whole page group - the group will not be destroyed
@@ -588,7 +585,7 @@ nfs_lock_and_join_requests(struct page *
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	nfs_join_page_group(head, &cinfo, inode);
+	nfs_join_page_group(head, inode);
 
 	return head;
 }
@@ -959,16 +956,18 @@ nfs_clear_page_commit(struct page *page)
 }
 
 /* Called holding the request lock on @req */
-static void nfs_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
-				     struct nfs_page *req)
+static void
+nfs_clear_request_commit(struct nfs_page *req)
 {
 	if (test_bit(PG_CLEAN, &req->wb_flags)) {
 		struct nfs_open_context *ctx = nfs_req_openctx(req);
 		struct inode *inode = d_inode(ctx->dentry);
+		struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
 
+		nfs_init_cinfo_from_inode(&cinfo, inode);
 		mutex_lock(&NFS_I(inode)->commit_mutex);
-		if (!pnfs_clear_request_commit(req, cinfo)) {
-			nfs_request_remove_commit_list(req, cinfo);
+		if (!pnfs_clear_request_commit(req, &cinfo)) {
+			nfs_request_remove_commit_list(req, &cinfo);
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&NFS_I(inode)->commit_mutex);
 		nfs_clear_page_commit(req->wb_page);
--- a/include/linux/nfs_page.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_page.h
@@ -145,9 +145,7 @@ extern	void nfs_unlock_request(struct nf
 extern	void nfs_unlock_and_release_request(struct nfs_page *);
 extern	struct nfs_page *nfs_page_group_lock_head(struct nfs_page *req);
 extern	int nfs_page_group_lock_subrequests(struct nfs_page *head);
-extern void nfs_join_page_group(struct nfs_page *head,
-				struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,
-				struct inode *inode);
+extern	void nfs_join_page_group(struct nfs_page *head, struct inode *inode);
 extern int nfs_page_group_lock(struct nfs_page *);
 extern void nfs_page_group_unlock(struct nfs_page *);
 extern bool nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit(struct nfs_page *, unsigned int);



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1 3/6] Revert "NFS: More O_DIRECT accounting fixes for error paths"
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 1/6] Revert "NFS: More fixes for nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 2/6] Revert "NFS: Use the correct commit info in nfs_join_page_group()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 4/6] Revert "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, poester, Daniel Díaz,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Sasha Levin

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit 1f49386d67792424028acfe781d466b010f8fa3f which is
commit 8982f7aff39fb526aba4441fff2525fcedd5e1a3 upstream.

There are reported NFS problems in the 6.1.56 release, so revert a set
of NFS patches to hopefully resolve the issue.

Reported-by: poester <poester@internetbrands.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012165439.137237-2-kernel@linuxace.com
Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2023100755-livestock-barcode-fe41@gregkh
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -93,10 +93,12 @@ nfs_direct_handle_truncated(struct nfs_d
 		dreq->max_count = dreq_len;
 		if (dreq->count > dreq_len)
 			dreq->count = dreq_len;
-	}
 
-	if (test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_ERROR, &hdr->flags) && !dreq->error)
-		dreq->error = hdr->error;
+		if (test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_ERROR, &hdr->flags))
+			dreq->error = hdr->error;
+		else /* Clear outstanding error if this is EOF */
+			dreq->error = 0;
+	}
 }
 
 static void
@@ -118,18 +120,6 @@ nfs_direct_count_bytes(struct nfs_direct
 		dreq->count = dreq_len;
 }
 
-static void nfs_direct_truncate_request(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
-					struct nfs_page *req)
-{
-	loff_t offs = req_offset(req);
-	size_t req_start = (size_t)(offs - dreq->io_start);
-
-	if (req_start < dreq->max_count)
-		dreq->max_count = req_start;
-	if (req_start < dreq->count)
-		dreq->count = req_start;
-}
-
 /**
  * nfs_swap_rw - NFS address space operation for swap I/O
  * @iocb: target I/O control block
@@ -549,6 +539,10 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(
 
 	nfs_direct_join_group(&reqs, dreq->inode);
 
+	dreq->count = 0;
+	dreq->max_count = 0;
+	list_for_each_entry(req, &reqs, wb_list)
+		dreq->max_count += req->wb_bytes;
 	nfs_clear_pnfs_ds_commit_verifiers(&dreq->ds_cinfo);
 	get_dreq(dreq);
 
@@ -582,14 +576,10 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(
 		req = nfs_list_entry(reqs.next);
 		nfs_list_remove_request(req);
 		nfs_unlock_and_release_request(req);
-		if (desc.pg_error == -EAGAIN) {
+		if (desc.pg_error == -EAGAIN)
 			nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
-		} else {
-			spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
-			nfs_direct_truncate_request(dreq, req);
-			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
+		else
 			nfs_release_request(req);
-		}
 	}
 
 	if (put_dreq(dreq))
@@ -609,6 +599,8 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(s
 	if (status < 0) {
 		/* Errors in commit are fatal */
 		dreq->error = status;
+		dreq->max_count = 0;
+		dreq->count = 0;
 		dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_DONE;
 	} else {
 		status = dreq->error;
@@ -619,12 +611,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(s
 	while (!list_empty(&data->pages)) {
 		req = nfs_list_entry(data->pages.next);
 		nfs_list_remove_request(req);
-		if (status < 0) {
-			spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
-			nfs_direct_truncate_request(dreq, req);
-			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
-			nfs_release_request(req);
-		} else if (!nfs_write_match_verf(verf, req)) {
+		if (status >= 0 && !nfs_write_match_verf(verf, req)) {
 			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
 			/*
 			 * Despite the reboot, the write was successful,
@@ -632,7 +619,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(s
 			 */
 			req->wb_nio = 0;
 			nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
-		} else
+		} else /* Error or match */
 			nfs_release_request(req);
 		nfs_unlock_and_release_request(req);
 	}
@@ -685,7 +672,6 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_clear_reqs(
 	while (!list_empty(&reqs)) {
 		req = nfs_list_entry(reqs.next);
 		nfs_list_remove_request(req);
-		nfs_direct_truncate_request(dreq, req);
 		nfs_release_request(req);
 		nfs_unlock_and_release_request(req);
 	}
@@ -735,8 +721,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_completion(
 	}
 
 	nfs_direct_count_bytes(dreq, hdr);
-	if (test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_UNSTABLE_WRITES, &hdr->flags) &&
-	    !test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_ERROR, &hdr->flags)) {
+	if (test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_UNSTABLE_WRITES, &hdr->flags)) {
 		if (!dreq->flags)
 			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_DO_COMMIT;
 		flags = dreq->flags;



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1 4/6] Revert "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues"
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 3/6] Revert "NFS: More O_DIRECT accounting fixes for error paths" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 5/6] Revert "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, poester, Daniel Díaz,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Sasha Levin

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit 4d98038e5bd939bd13cc4e602dfe60cd5110efa8 which is
commit 7c6339322ce0c6128acbe36aacc1eeb986dd7bf1 upstream.

There are reported NFS problems in the 6.1.56 release, so revert a set
of NFS patches to hopefully resolve the issue.

Reported-by: poester <poester@internetbrands.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012165439.137237-2-kernel@linuxace.com
Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2023100755-livestock-barcode-fe41@gregkh
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(
 		/* Bump the transmission count */
 		req->wb_nio++;
 		if (!nfs_pageio_add_request(&desc, req)) {
-			spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
+			spin_lock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
 			if (dreq->error < 0) {
 				desc.pg_error = dreq->error;
 			} else if (desc.pg_error != -EAGAIN) {
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(
 				dreq->error = desc.pg_error;
 			} else
 				dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
-			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
 			break;
 		}
 		nfs_release_request(req);
@@ -875,9 +875,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule
 
 			/* If the error is soft, defer remaining requests */
 			nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
-			spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
+			spin_lock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
 			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
-			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
 			nfs_unlock_request(req);
 			nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
 			desc.pg_error = 0;



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1 5/6] Revert "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling"
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 4/6] Revert "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages() Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, poester, Daniel Díaz,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Sasha Levin

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit f16fd0b11f0f4d41846b5102b1656ea1fc9ac7a0 which is
commit 954998b60caa8f2a3bf3abe490de6f08d283687a upstream.

There are reported NFS problems in the 6.1.56 release, so revert a set
of NFS patches to hopefully resolve the issue.

Reported-by: poester <poester@internetbrands.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012165439.137237-2-kernel@linuxace.com
Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2023100755-livestock-barcode-fe41@gregkh
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c |   62 ++++++++++++++------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -530,9 +530,10 @@ nfs_direct_write_scan_commit_list(struct
 static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq)
 {
 	struct nfs_pageio_descriptor desc;
-	struct nfs_page *req;
+	struct nfs_page *req, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(reqs);
 	struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
+	LIST_HEAD(failed);
 
 	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
 	nfs_direct_write_scan_commit_list(dreq->inode, &reqs, &cinfo);
@@ -550,36 +551,27 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_reschedule(
 			      &nfs_direct_write_completion_ops);
 	desc.pg_dreq = dreq;
 
-	while (!list_empty(&reqs)) {
-		req = nfs_list_entry(reqs.next);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &reqs, wb_list) {
 		/* Bump the transmission count */
 		req->wb_nio++;
 		if (!nfs_pageio_add_request(&desc, req)) {
+			nfs_list_move_request(req, &failed);
 			spin_lock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
-			if (dreq->error < 0) {
-				desc.pg_error = dreq->error;
-			} else if (desc.pg_error != -EAGAIN) {
-				dreq->flags = 0;
-				if (!desc.pg_error)
-					desc.pg_error = -EIO;
+			dreq->flags = 0;
+			if (desc.pg_error < 0)
 				dreq->error = desc.pg_error;
-			} else
-				dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
+			else
+				dreq->error = -EIO;
 			spin_unlock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
-			break;
 		}
 		nfs_release_request(req);
 	}
 	nfs_pageio_complete(&desc);
 
-	while (!list_empty(&reqs)) {
-		req = nfs_list_entry(reqs.next);
+	while (!list_empty(&failed)) {
+		req = nfs_list_entry(failed.next);
 		nfs_list_remove_request(req);
 		nfs_unlock_and_release_request(req);
-		if (desc.pg_error == -EAGAIN)
-			nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
-		else
-			nfs_release_request(req);
 	}
 
 	if (put_dreq(dreq))
@@ -804,11 +796,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule
 {
 	struct nfs_pageio_descriptor desc;
 	struct inode *inode = dreq->inode;
-	struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
 	ssize_t result = 0;
 	size_t requested_bytes = 0;
 	size_t wsize = max_t(size_t, NFS_SERVER(inode)->wsize, PAGE_SIZE);
-	bool defer = false;
 
 	trace_nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq);
 
@@ -849,39 +839,19 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule
 				break;
 			}
 
-			pgbase = 0;
-			bytes -= req_len;
-			requested_bytes += req_len;
-			pos += req_len;
-			dreq->bytes_left -= req_len;
-
-			if (defer) {
-				nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
-				continue;
-			}
-
 			nfs_lock_request(req);
 			req->wb_index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 			req->wb_offset = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
-			if (nfs_pageio_add_request(&desc, req))
-				continue;
-
-			/* Exit on hard errors */
-			if (desc.pg_error < 0 && desc.pg_error != -EAGAIN) {
+			if (!nfs_pageio_add_request(&desc, req)) {
 				result = desc.pg_error;
 				nfs_unlock_and_release_request(req);
 				break;
 			}
-
-			/* If the error is soft, defer remaining requests */
-			nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
-			spin_lock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
-			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
-			spin_unlock(&cinfo.inode->i_lock);
-			nfs_unlock_request(req);
-			nfs_mark_request_commit(req, NULL, &cinfo, 0);
-			desc.pg_error = 0;
-			defer = true;
+			pgbase = 0;
+			bytes -= req_len;
+			requested_bytes += req_len;
+			pos += req_len;
+			dreq->bytes_left -= req_len;
 		}
 		nfs_direct_release_pages(pagevec, npages);
 		kvfree(pagevec);



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages()
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 5/6] Revert "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-10-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable, linux-kernel
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, Andrew Donnellan,
	Alexander Potapenko, Xiaoke Wang, Andrew Morton

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit efb78fa86e95 ("lib/test_meminit: allocate pages up to order
MAX_ORDER") works great in kernels 6.4 and newer thanks to commit
23baf831a32c ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely"), but for older
kernels, the loop is off by one, which causes crashes when the test
runs.

Fix this up by changing "<= MAX_ORDER" "< MAX_ORDER" to allow the test
to work properly for older kernel branches.

Fixes: 421855d0d24d ("lib/test_meminit: allocate pages up to order MAX_ORDER")
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 lib/test_meminit.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/lib/test_meminit.c
+++ b/lib/test_meminit.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int __init test_pages(int *total_
 	int failures = 0, num_tests = 0;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i <= MAX_ORDER; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ORDER; i++)
 		num_tests += do_alloc_pages_order(i, &failures);
 
 	REPORT_FAILURES_IN_FN();



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages() Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-12 18:43 ` Florian Fainelli
  2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-10-12 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
	conor

On 10/12/23 11:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
  2023-10-13  2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-10-12 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 781 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-10-13  2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
  2023-10-13  5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-10-13  2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 529 pass: 529 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-13  2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-10-13  5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
  2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-10-13  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 557 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully compiled and installed bindeb-pkgs on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-13  5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
  2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2023-10-13 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor

Hi Greg

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 3:01 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

6.1.58-rc1 tested.

Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)

Thanks

Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
  2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
  2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-10-13 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor

On 10/12/23 11:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
  2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo B. Marliere @ 2023-10-13 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor

On 23/10/12 08:00PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

No build errors, dmesg is clean. My system runs fine:

Linux version 6.1.58-rc1+ (rbmarliere@debian) (Debian clang version 16.0.6 (15), GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.41) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Oct 13 10:03:55 -03 2023

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core Processor


Tested-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review
  2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
@ 2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-10-13 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, LTP List
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 23:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

NOTE:
Following LTP dio and hugetlb test cases are back to PASS status.

Fixes compared with last release.
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
  - dio01
  - dio02
  - dio03
  - dio05
  - dio06
  - dio07
  - dio08
  - dio09
  - dio11

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
  - hugemmap11


## Build
* kernel: 6.1.58-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 3fe61dd155ac48d1642f5cac17bd41a92ef585b7
* git describe: v6.1.57-7-g3fe61dd155ac
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.57-7-g3fe61dd155ac

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.57)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.57)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.57)
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
  - dio01
  - dio02
  - dio03
  - dio05
  - dio06
  - dio07
  - dio08
  - dio09
  - dio11

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
  - hugemmap11

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.57)

## Test result summary
total: 114725, pass: 97010, fail: 2320, skip: 15240, xfail: 155

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 149 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 53 total, 52 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 41 total, 39 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 29 total, 27 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 15 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* v4l2-complianciance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-13 16:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-12 18:00 [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 1/6] Revert "NFS: More fixes for nfs_direct_write_reschedule_io()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 2/6] Revert "NFS: Use the correct commit info in nfs_join_page_group()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 3/6] Revert "NFS: More O_DIRECT accounting fixes for error paths" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 4/6] Revert "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 5/6] Revert "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 6/6] lib/test_meminit: fix off-by-one error in test_pages() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 6.1 0/6] 6.1.58-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
2023-10-12 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
2023-10-13  2:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-10-13  5:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-10-13 12:15 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2023-10-13 13:10 ` Ron Economos
2023-10-13 13:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
2023-10-13 16:53 ` Naresh Kamboju

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).