From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tzungbi@kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
groeck@chromium.org, swboyd@chromium.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iio: cros_ec: fix an use-after-free in" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:35:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023101526-sweep-stray-4f99@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 7771c8c80d62ad065637ef74ed2962983f6c5f6d
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023101526-sweep-stray-4f99@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7771c8c80d62ad065637ef74ed2962983f6c5f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:06:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] iio: cros_ec: fix an use-after-free in
cros_ec_sensors_push_data()
cros_ec_sensors_push_data() reads `indio_dev->active_scan_mask` and
calls iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp() without making sure the
`indio_dev` stays in buffer mode. There is a race if `indio_dev` exits
buffer mode right before cros_ec_sensors_push_data() accesses them.
An use-after-free on `indio_dev->active_scan_mask` was observed. The
call trace:
[...]
_find_next_bit
cros_ec_sensors_push_data
cros_ec_sensorhub_event
blocking_notifier_call_chain
cros_ec_irq_thread
It was caused by a race condition: one thread just freed
`active_scan_mask` at [1]; while another thread tried to access the
memory at [2].
Fix it by calling iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() to ensure the
`indio_dev` can't exit buffer mode during cros_ec_sensors_push_data().
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5/source/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c#L1189
[2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5/source/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c#L198
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: aa984f1ba4a4 ("iio: cros_ec: Register to cros_ec_sensorhub when EC supports FIFO")
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829030622.1571852-1-tzungbi@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
index b72d39fc2434..6bfe5d6847e7 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
@@ -190,8 +190,11 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_push_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
/*
* Ignore samples if the buffer is not set: it is needed if the ODR is
* set but the buffer is not enabled yet.
+ *
+ * Note: iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() returns -EBUSY if the buffer
+ * is not enabled.
*/
- if (!iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev))
+ if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev) < 0)
return 0;
out = (s16 *)st->samples;
@@ -210,6 +213,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_push_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, st->samples,
timestamp + delta);
+ iio_device_release_buffer_mode(indio_dev);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensors_push_data);
reply other threads:[~2023-10-15 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023101526-sweep-stray-4f99@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox