[PATCH 5.15 028/102] riscv, bpf: Factor out emit_call for kernel and bpf context

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 0fd1fd0104954380477353aea29c347e85dff16d ]

The current emit_call function is not suitable for kernel function call as
it store return value to bpf R0 register. We can separate it out for common
use. Meanwhile, simplify judgment logic, that is, fixed function address
can use jal or auipc+jalr, while the unfixed can use only auipc+jalr.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230215135205.1411105-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Stable-dep-of: 2f1b0d3d7331 ("riscv, bpf: Sign-extend return values")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 2e3f1a626a3af..5fc1386bf311d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -413,12 +413,12 @@ static void emit_sext_32_rd(u8 *rd, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 	*rd = RV_REG_T2;
 }
 
-static int emit_jump_and_link(u8 rd, s64 rvoff, bool force_jalr,
+static int emit_jump_and_link(u8 rd, s64 rvoff, bool fixed_addr,
 			      struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
 	s64 upper, lower;
 
-	if (rvoff && is_21b_int(rvoff) && !force_jalr) {
+	if (rvoff && fixed_addr && is_21b_int(rvoff)) {
 		emit(rv_jal(rd, rvoff >> 1), ctx);
 		return 0;
 	} else if (in_auipc_jalr_range(rvoff)) {
@@ -439,24 +439,17 @@ static bool is_signed_bpf_cond(u8 cond)
 		cond == BPF_JSGE || cond == BPF_JSLE;
 }
 
-static int emit_call(bool fixed, u64 addr, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+static int emit_call(u64 addr, bool fixed_addr, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
 	s64 off = 0;
 	u64 ip;
-	u8 rd;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (addr && ctx->insns) {
 		ip = (u64)(long)(ctx->insns + ctx->ninsns);
 		off = addr - ip;
 	}
 
-	ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_RA, off, !fixed, ctx);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-	rd = bpf_to_rv_reg(BPF_REG_0, ctx);
-	emit_mv(rd, RV_REG_A0, ctx);
-	return 0;
+	return emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_RA, off, fixed_addr, ctx);
 }
 
 int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
@@ -750,7 +743,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 	/* JUMP off */
 	case BPF_JMP | BPF_JA:
 		rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx);
-		ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, false, ctx);
+		ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, true, ctx);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		break;
@@ -869,17 +862,20 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 	/* function call */
 	case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
 	{
-		bool fixed;
+		bool fixed_addr;
 		u64 addr;
 
 		mark_call(ctx);
-		ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(ctx->prog, insn, extra_pass, &addr,
-					    &fixed);
+		ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(ctx->prog, insn, extra_pass,
+					    &addr, &fixed_addr);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
-		ret = emit_call(fixed, addr, ctx);
+
+		ret = emit_call(addr, fixed_addr, ctx);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
+
+		emit_mv(bpf_to_rv_reg(BPF_REG_0, ctx), RV_REG_A0, ctx);
 		break;
 	}
 	/* tail call */
@@ -894,7 +890,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 			break;
 
 		rvoff = epilogue_offset(ctx);
-		ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, false, ctx);
+		ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, true, ctx);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		break;
-- 
2.40.1