stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device
@ 2023-11-10  7:55 Herve Codina
  2023-11-11  1:50 ` Saravana Kannan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herve Codina @ 2023-11-10  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Saravana Kannan
  Cc: linux-kernel, Allan Nielsen, Horatiu Vultur, Steen Hegelund,
	Thomas Petazzoni, Herve Codina, stable

The commit 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child
fwnode's consumer links") introduces the possibility to use the
supplier's parent device instead of the supplier itself.
In that case the supplier fwnode used is not updated and is no more
consistent with the supplier device used.

Update the fwnode used to be consistent with the supplier device used.

Fixes: 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 4d8b315c48a1..17f2568e0a79 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -2076,6 +2076,18 @@ static int fw_devlink_create_devlink(struct device *con,
 		sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(sup_handle);
 
 	if (sup_dev) {
+		/*
+		 * The supplier device may have changed and so, the supplier
+		 * fwnode maybe inconsistent.
+		 * Update the supplier fwnode
+		 */
+		sup_handle = sup_dev->fwnode;
+		if (!sup_handle) {
+			dev_dbg(con, "Not linking %s - fwnode NULL\n",
+				dev_name(sup_dev));
+			goto out;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * If it's one of those drivers that don't actually bind to
 		 * their device using driver core, then don't wait on this
-- 
2.41.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device
  2023-11-10  7:55 [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device Herve Codina
@ 2023-11-11  1:50 ` Saravana Kannan
  2023-11-13  9:38   ` Herve Codina
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Saravana Kannan @ 2023-11-11  1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Herve Codina
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel,
	Allan Nielsen, Horatiu Vultur, Steen Hegelund, Thomas Petazzoni,
	stable

On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:56 PM Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> The commit 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child
> fwnode's consumer links") introduces the possibility to use the
> supplier's parent device instead of the supplier itself.
> In that case the supplier fwnode used is not updated and is no more
> consistent with the supplier device used.
>
> Update the fwnode used to be consistent with the supplier device used.
>
> Fixes: 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 4d8b315c48a1..17f2568e0a79 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -2076,6 +2076,18 @@ static int fw_devlink_create_devlink(struct device *con,
>                 sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(sup_handle);
>
>         if (sup_dev) {
> +               /*
> +                * The supplier device may have changed and so, the supplier
> +                * fwnode maybe inconsistent.
> +                * Update the supplier fwnode
> +                */
> +               sup_handle = sup_dev->fwnode;
> +               if (!sup_handle) {
> +                       dev_dbg(con, "Not linking %s - fwnode NULL\n",
> +                               dev_name(sup_dev));
> +                       goto out;
> +               }
> +

Nack. It's easier to debug when you know what supplier you were
pointing to in DT that triggered the creation of the device link. The
parent could be several levels up and multiple supplier links might be
skipped for various reasons. If they all printed the parent's fwnode,
it'll be confusing to debug.

-Saravana

>                 /*
>                  * If it's one of those drivers that don't actually bind to
>                  * their device using driver core, then don't wait on this
> --
> 2.41.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device
  2023-11-11  1:50 ` Saravana Kannan
@ 2023-11-13  9:38   ` Herve Codina
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herve Codina @ 2023-11-13  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Saravana Kannan
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-kernel,
	Allan Nielsen, Horatiu Vultur, Steen Hegelund, Thomas Petazzoni,
	stable

Hi Saravana,

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:50:07 -0800
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 11:56 PM Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > The commit 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child
> > fwnode's consumer links") introduces the possibility to use the
> > supplier's parent device instead of the supplier itself.
> > In that case the supplier fwnode used is not updated and is no more
> > consistent with the supplier device used.
> >
> > Update the fwnode used to be consistent with the supplier device used.
> >
> > Fixes: 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > index 4d8b315c48a1..17f2568e0a79 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> > @@ -2076,6 +2076,18 @@ static int fw_devlink_create_devlink(struct device *con,
> >                 sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(sup_handle);
> >
> >         if (sup_dev) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * The supplier device may have changed and so, the supplier
> > +                * fwnode maybe inconsistent.
> > +                * Update the supplier fwnode
> > +                */
> > +               sup_handle = sup_dev->fwnode;
> > +               if (!sup_handle) {
> > +                       dev_dbg(con, "Not linking %s - fwnode NULL\n",
> > +                               dev_name(sup_dev));
> > +                       goto out;
> > +               }
> > +  
> 
> Nack. It's easier to debug when you know what supplier you were
> pointing to in DT that triggered the creation of the device link. The
> parent could be several levels up and multiple supplier links might be
> skipped for various reasons. If they all printed the parent's fwnode,
> it'll be confusing to debug.

In fact, I will remove the check if(!sup_handle) in the next iteration.

Indeed, sup_handle cannot be NULL.
sup_dev is retrieved from fwnode_get_next_parent_dev() or get_dev_from_fwnode().
In both cases, if sup_dev is valid, sup_dev->fwnode is valid too.
So, the check and the dev_dbg() call make no sense.

Best regards,
Hervé

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-13  9:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-10  7:55 [PATCH 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device Herve Codina
2023-11-11  1:50 ` Saravana Kannan
2023-11-13  9:38   ` Herve Codina

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).