From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:26:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231114152655.409331-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> (raw)
A refcount issue can appeared in __fwnode_link_del() due to the
pr_debug() call:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 901 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
Call Trace:
<TASK>
...
of_node_get+0x1e/0x30
of_fwnode_get+0x28/0x40
fwnode_full_name_string+0x34/0x90
fwnode_string+0xdb/0x140
...
vsnprintf+0x17b/0x630
...
__fwnode_link_del+0x25/0xa0
fwnode_links_purge+0x39/0xb0
of_node_release+0xd9/0x180
...
Indeed, an fwnode (of_node) is being destroyed and so, of_node_release()
is called because the of_node refcount reached 0.
From of_node_release() several function calls are done and lead to
a pr_debug() calls with %pfwf to print the fwnode full name.
The issue is not present if we change %pfwf to %pfwP.
To print the full name, %pfwf iterates over the current node and its
parents and obtain/drop a reference to all nodes involved.
In order to allow to print the full name (%pfwf) of a node while it is
being destroyed, do not obtain/drop a reference to this current node.
Fixes: a92eb7621b9f ("lib/vsprintf: Make use of fwnode API to obtain node names and separators")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes v2 -> v3
- Fix typo in comment ("ie parents node" -> "i.e. parent nodes")
- Add 'Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>'
- Add 'Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>'
Changes v1 -> v2
- Avoid handling current node out of the loop. Instead obtain/drop references
in the loop based on the depth value.
- Remove some of the backtrace lines in the commit log.
lib/vsprintf.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index afb88b24fa74..2aa408441cd3 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -2110,15 +2110,20 @@ char *fwnode_full_name_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf,
/* Loop starting from the root node to the current node. */
for (depth = fwnode_count_parents(fwnode); depth >= 0; depth--) {
- struct fwnode_handle *__fwnode =
- fwnode_get_nth_parent(fwnode, depth);
+ /*
+ * Only get a reference for other nodes (i.e. parent nodes).
+ * fwnode refcount may be 0 here.
+ */
+ struct fwnode_handle *__fwnode = depth ?
+ fwnode_get_nth_parent(fwnode, depth) : fwnode;
buf = string(buf, end, fwnode_get_name_prefix(__fwnode),
default_str_spec);
buf = string(buf, end, fwnode_get_name(__fwnode),
default_str_spec);
- fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);
+ if (depth)
+ fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);
}
return buf;
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-14 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 15:26 Herve Codina [this message]
2023-12-06 10:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0 Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231114152655.409331-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox