From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E58C072A2 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344164AbjKOUBi (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:01:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51034 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344139AbjKOUBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:01:37 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95BFC2 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F82DC433C7; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:01:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1700078493; bh=BRIEdADZbNO9uqGP/BJgGLEjhL0/72inlMwdtze0vYo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NwLeMkAZebjWbmURYM7AZKDWIL4tFn9Xgn+b7UBjjf6sNHp6zMBU1DQvSiV/EswNt VZvkO7ea+u9I/HWg/FL0uRNYd+Z0u9bR7/gH7WGG9ZC11EjdkTxeMOuMQ524VgoG3S iK9tmOFxEDtU0Oehl05o7beNTfcQ7EdQMO75T6ZE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, George Stark , =?UTF-8?q?Uwe=20Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Thierry Reding , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 331/379] pwm: sti: Reduce number of allocations and drop usage of chip_data Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:26:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20231115192704.737503400@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.1 In-Reply-To: <20231115192645.143643130@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231115192645.143643130@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Uwe Kleine-König [ Upstream commit 2d6812b41e0d832919d72c72ebddf361df53ba1b ] Instead of using one allocation per capture channel, use a single one. Also store it in driver data instead of chip data. This has several advantages: - driver data isn't cleared when pwm_put() is called - Reduces memory fragmentation Also register the pwm chip only after the per capture channel data is initialized as the capture callback relies on this initialization and it might be called even before pwmchip_add() returns. It would be still better to have struct sti_pwm_compat_data and the per-channel data struct sti_cpt_ddata in a single memory chunk, but that's not easily possible because the number of capture channels isn't known yet when the driver data struct is allocated. Fixes: e926b12c611c ("pwm: Clear chip_data in pwm_put()") Reported-by: George Stark Fixes: c97267ae831d ("pwm: sti: Add PWM capture callback") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230705080650.2353391-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c index 44b1f93256b36..652fdb8dc7bfa 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct sti_pwm_compat_data { unsigned int cpt_num_devs; unsigned int max_pwm_cnt; unsigned int max_prescale; + struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata; }; struct sti_pwm_chip { @@ -314,7 +315,7 @@ static int sti_pwm_capture(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, { struct sti_pwm_chip *pc = to_sti_pwmchip(chip); struct sti_pwm_compat_data *cdata = pc->cdata; - struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm); + struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata = &cdata->ddata[pwm->hwpwm]; struct device *dev = pc->dev; unsigned int effective_ticks; unsigned long long high, low; @@ -440,7 +441,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sti_pwm_interrupt(int irq, void *data) while (cpt_int_stat) { devicenum = ffs(cpt_int_stat) - 1; - ddata = pwm_get_chip_data(&pc->chip.pwms[devicenum]); + ddata = &pc->cdata->ddata[devicenum]; /* * Capture input: @@ -638,30 +639,28 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare clock\n"); return ret; } + + cdata->ddata = devm_kzalloc(dev, cdata->cpt_num_devs * sizeof(*cdata->ddata), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!cdata->ddata) + return -ENOMEM; } pc->chip.dev = dev; pc->chip.ops = &sti_pwm_ops; pc->chip.npwm = pc->cdata->pwm_num_devs; - ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip); - if (ret < 0) { - clk_unprepare(pc->pwm_clk); - clk_unprepare(pc->cpt_clk); - return ret; - } - for (i = 0; i < cdata->cpt_num_devs; i++) { - struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata; - - ddata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!ddata) - return -ENOMEM; + struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata = &cdata->ddata[i]; init_waitqueue_head(&ddata->wait); mutex_init(&ddata->lock); + } - pwm_set_chip_data(&pc->chip.pwms[i], ddata); + ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip); + if (ret < 0) { + clk_unprepare(pc->pwm_clk); + clk_unprepare(pc->cpt_clk); + return ret; } platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc); -- 2.42.0