* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] selftests/resctrl: Extend signal handler coverage to unmount" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
@ 2023-11-23 11:55 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2023-11-23 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ilpo.jarvinen, reinette.chatre, skhan, stable, tan.shaopeng; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 3aff5146445582454c35900f3c0c972987cdd595
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023112321-epic-pamphlet-c600@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
3aff51464455 ("selftests/resctrl: Extend signal handler coverage to unmount on receiving signal")
e33cb5702a9f ("selftests/resctrl: Make benchmark command const and build it with pointers")
b1a901e078c4 ("selftests/resctrl: Simplify span lifetime")
47e36f16c784 ("selftests/resctrl: Remove bw_report and bm_type from main()")
4a28c7665c2a ("selftests/resctrl: Ensure the benchmark commands fits to its array")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 3aff5146445582454c35900f3c0c972987cdd595 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:48:08 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/resctrl: Extend signal handler coverage to unmount
on receiving signal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Unmounting resctrl FS has been moved into the per test functions in
resctrl_tests.c by commit caddc0fbe495 ("selftests/resctrl: Move
resctrl FS mount/umount to higher level"). In case a signal (SIGINT,
SIGTERM, or SIGHUP) is received, the running selftest is aborted by
ctrlc_handler() which then unmounts resctrl fs before exiting. The
current section between signal_handler_register() and
signal_handler_unregister(), however, does not cover the entire
duration when resctrl FS is mounted.
Move signal_handler_register() and signal_handler_unregister() calls
from per test files into resctrl_tests.c to properly unmount resctrl
fs. In order to not add signal_handler_register()/unregister() n times,
create helpers test_prepare() and test_cleanup().
Do not call ksft_exit_fail_msg() in test_prepare() but only in the per
test function to keep the control flow cleaner without adding calls to
exit() deep into the call chain.
Adjust child process kill() call in ctrlc_handler() to only be invoked
if the child was already forked.
Fixes: caddc0fbe495 ("selftests/resctrl: Move resctrl FS mount/umount to higher level")
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
index 97b87285ab2a..224ba8544d8a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
@@ -167,12 +167,6 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
strcpy(param.filename, RESULT_FILE_NAME1);
param.num_of_runs = 0;
param.cpu_no = sibling_cpu_no;
- } else {
- ret = signal_handler_register();
- if (ret) {
- kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
- goto out;
- }
}
remove(param.filename);
@@ -209,10 +203,8 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
}
close(pipefd[0]);
kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
- signal_handler_unregister();
}
-out:
cat_test_cleanup();
return ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index 823672a20a43..495aeee5b734 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -67,21 +67,45 @@ void tests_cleanup(void)
cat_test_cleanup();
}
-static void run_mbm_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
+static int test_prepare(void)
{
int res;
- ksft_print_msg("Starting MBM BW change ...\n");
+ res = signal_handler_register();
+ if (res) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to register signal handler\n");
+ return res;
+ }
res = mount_resctrlfs();
if (res) {
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to mount resctrl FS\n");
+ signal_handler_unregister();
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to mount resctrl FS\n");
+ return res;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void test_cleanup(void)
+{
+ umount_resctrlfs();
+ signal_handler_unregister();
+}
+
+static void run_mbm_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
+{
+ int res;
+
+ ksft_print_msg("Starting MBM BW change ...\n");
+
+ if (test_prepare()) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Abnormal failure when preparing for the test\n");
return;
}
if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request(MBM_STR) || (get_vendor() != ARCH_INTEL)) {
ksft_test_result_skip("Hardware does not support MBM or MBM is disabled\n");
- goto umount;
+ goto cleanup;
}
res = mbm_bw_change(cpu_no, benchmark_cmd);
@@ -89,8 +113,8 @@ static void run_mbm_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
if ((get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL) && res)
ksft_print_msg("Intel MBM may be inaccurate when Sub-NUMA Clustering is enabled. Check BIOS configuration.\n");
-umount:
- umount_resctrlfs();
+cleanup:
+ test_cleanup();
}
static void run_mba_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
@@ -99,22 +123,21 @@ static void run_mba_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
ksft_print_msg("Starting MBA Schemata change ...\n");
- res = mount_resctrlfs();
- if (res) {
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to mount resctrl FS\n");
+ if (test_prepare()) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Abnormal failure when preparing for the test\n");
return;
}
if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request(MBA_STR) || (get_vendor() != ARCH_INTEL)) {
ksft_test_result_skip("Hardware does not support MBA or MBA is disabled\n");
- goto umount;
+ goto cleanup;
}
res = mba_schemata_change(cpu_no, benchmark_cmd);
ksft_test_result(!res, "MBA: schemata change\n");
-umount:
- umount_resctrlfs();
+cleanup:
+ test_cleanup();
}
static void run_cmt_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
@@ -123,15 +146,14 @@ static void run_cmt_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
ksft_print_msg("Starting CMT test ...\n");
- res = mount_resctrlfs();
- if (res) {
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to mount resctrl FS\n");
+ if (test_prepare()) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Abnormal failure when preparing for the test\n");
return;
}
if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request(CMT_STR)) {
ksft_test_result_skip("Hardware does not support CMT or CMT is disabled\n");
- goto umount;
+ goto cleanup;
}
res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, 5, benchmark_cmd);
@@ -139,8 +161,8 @@ static void run_cmt_test(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, int cpu_no)
if ((get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL) && res)
ksft_print_msg("Intel CMT may be inaccurate when Sub-NUMA Clustering is enabled. Check BIOS configuration.\n");
-umount:
- umount_resctrlfs();
+cleanup:
+ test_cleanup();
}
static void run_cat_test(int cpu_no, int no_of_bits)
@@ -149,22 +171,21 @@ static void run_cat_test(int cpu_no, int no_of_bits)
ksft_print_msg("Starting CAT test ...\n");
- res = mount_resctrlfs();
- if (res) {
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to mount resctrl FS\n");
+ if (test_prepare()) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Abnormal failure when preparing for the test\n");
return;
}
if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request(CAT_STR)) {
ksft_test_result_skip("Hardware does not support CAT or CAT is disabled\n");
- goto umount;
+ goto cleanup;
}
res = cat_perf_miss_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, "L3");
ksft_test_result(!res, "CAT: test\n");
-umount:
- umount_resctrlfs();
+cleanup:
+ test_cleanup();
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
index 01bbe11a8983..b8ca6fa40b3b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
@@ -468,7 +468,9 @@ pid_t bm_pid, ppid;
void ctrlc_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ptr)
{
- kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
+ /* Only kill child after bm_pid is set after fork() */
+ if (bm_pid)
+ kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
umount_resctrlfs();
tests_cleanup();
ksft_print_msg("Ending\n\n");
@@ -485,6 +487,8 @@ int signal_handler_register(void)
struct sigaction sigact = {};
int ret = 0;
+ bm_pid = 0;
+
sigact.sa_sigaction = ctrlc_handler;
sigemptyset(&sigact.sa_mask);
sigact.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
@@ -706,10 +710,6 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
ksft_print_msg("Benchmark PID: %d\n", bm_pid);
- ret = signal_handler_register();
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
/*
* The cast removes constness but nothing mutates benchmark_cmd within
* the context of this process. At the receiving process, it becomes
@@ -721,19 +721,19 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
/* Taskset benchmark to specified cpu */
ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
if (ret)
- goto unregister;
+ goto out;
/* Write benchmark to specified control&monitoring grp in resctrl FS */
ret = write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(bm_pid, param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
resctrl_val);
if (ret)
- goto unregister;
+ goto out;
if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, MBM_STR, sizeof(MBM_STR)) ||
!strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR))) {
ret = initialize_mem_bw_imc();
if (ret)
- goto unregister;
+ goto out;
initialize_mem_bw_resctrl(param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
param->cpu_no, resctrl_val);
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
sizeof(pipe_message)) {
perror("# failed reading message from child process");
close(pipefd[0]);
- goto unregister;
+ goto out;
}
}
close(pipefd[0]);
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
if (sigqueue(bm_pid, SIGUSR1, value) == -1) {
perror("# sigqueue SIGUSR1 to child");
ret = errno;
- goto unregister;
+ goto out;
}
/* Give benchmark enough time to fully run */
@@ -786,8 +786,6 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
}
}
-unregister:
- signal_handler_unregister();
out:
kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-11-23 11:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-23 11:55 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] selftests/resctrl: Extend signal handler coverage to unmount" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox