From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9912828DBB; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="skm5cLD1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 290C7C433C7; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1700852703; bh=Yh7tf1gXEpco01Zw+x45C+cEQA0yUTiQIJpYD7pxJh8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=skm5cLD1oKA0ndlLbb3bvOZBQSHqPiwxvOlhFCQ0xEDd4SnCnGg607XHp57Ju3skf k62B86x7rU0Xg54L06k7LwdSp/9YPw5BPNy2hVyi9ZydTzKzSjN3QFc++IQfhbU4Q4 P8hk6K4w7PZb0qGXabtKsKzlwi8XeBJA21V7MHZs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Olga Kornievskaia , Trond Myklebust , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 065/193] NFSv4.1: fix SP4_MACH_CRED protection for pnfs IO Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:53:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20231124171949.839421929@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20231124171947.127438872@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231124171947.127438872@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Olga Kornievskaia [ Upstream commit 5cc7688bae7f0757c39c1d3dfdd827b724061067 ] If the client is doing pnfs IO and Kerberos is configured and EXCHANGEID successfully negotiated SP4_MACH_CRED and WRITE/COMMIT are on the list of state protected operations, then we need to make sure to choose the DS's rpc_client structure instead of the MDS's one. Fixes: fb91fb0ee7b2 ("NFS: Move call to nfs4_state_protect_write() to nfs4_write_setup()") Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 1c2ed14bccef2..f3f41027f6977 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5508,7 +5508,7 @@ static void nfs4_proc_write_setup(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr, msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_WRITE]; nfs4_init_sequence(&hdr->args.seq_args, &hdr->res.seq_res, 0, 0); - nfs4_state_protect_write(server->nfs_client, clnt, msg, hdr); + nfs4_state_protect_write(hdr->ds_clp ? hdr->ds_clp : server->nfs_client, clnt, msg, hdr); } static void nfs4_proc_commit_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_commit_data *data) @@ -5549,7 +5549,8 @@ static void nfs4_proc_commit_setup(struct nfs_commit_data *data, struct rpc_mess data->res.server = server; msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_COMMIT]; nfs4_init_sequence(&data->args.seq_args, &data->res.seq_res, 1, 0); - nfs4_state_protect(server->nfs_client, NFS_SP4_MACH_CRED_COMMIT, clnt, msg); + nfs4_state_protect(data->ds_clp ? data->ds_clp : server->nfs_client, + NFS_SP4_MACH_CRED_COMMIT, clnt, msg); } static int _nfs4_proc_commit(struct file *dst, struct nfs_commitargs *args, -- 2.42.0