From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21453418E; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="bvoG4NUd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74E73C433C8; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:14:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1700853294; bh=MLEc9P9n1W6DV1W4vHIJ7eWzoaPl+nye8dhT0yqCzJ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bvoG4NUdQQyYtT4LGusHBuznJMLCPTTXFklt2it/DrQ2i89TyViIEWpb6D1a/oRjz ZVg1Aa5SeRXrHxxpbjMKtiGip2LIqe3Da9h988H+NTEP/TjMLhPO/nk7zra2saBHzS LBXzbBiEzfkdHkEntJM0MjmBhsCDRi0jD3VQMa4Q= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Yonglong Liu , Jijie Shao , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.15 107/297] net: hns3: add barrier in vf mailbox reply process Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:52:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20231124172004.018813147@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20231124172000.087816911@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231124172000.087816911@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Yonglong Liu [ Upstream commit ac92c0a9a0603fb448e60f38e63302e4eebb8035 ] In hclgevf_mbx_handler() and hclgevf_get_mbx_resp() functions, there is a typical store-store and load-load scenario between received_resp and additional_info. This patch adds barrier to fix the problem. Fixes: 4671042f1ef0 ("net: hns3: add match_id to check mailbox response from PF to VF") Signed-off-by: Yonglong Liu Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c index df6e9b8b26e0f..608a14fc27acc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static int hclgevf_get_mbx_resp(struct hclgevf_dev *hdev, u16 code0, u16 code1, i++; } + /* ensure additional_info will be seen after received_resp */ + smp_rmb(); + if (i >= HCLGEVF_MAX_TRY_TIMES) { dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev, "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) resp(=%d) from PF in %d tries\n", @@ -175,6 +178,10 @@ static void hclgevf_handle_mbx_response(struct hclgevf_dev *hdev, resp->resp_status = hclgevf_resp_to_errno(resp_status); memcpy(resp->additional_info, req->msg.resp_data, HCLGE_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE * sizeof(u8)); + + /* ensure additional_info will be seen before setting received_resp */ + smp_wmb(); + if (match_id) { /* If match_id is not zero, it means PF support match_id. * if the match_id is right, VF get the right response, or -- 2.42.0