From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6835381D6; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 18:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="XjejUvRe" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69336C433C8; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 18:07:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1700849241; bh=AmeGTX/2XoFOOzb4iWOGrfqkZO12j117C/Qp/rO7YvQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XjejUvReM4n0x7+mkgcM9zc8pwv3B4sbyJ9+CFp27glluMT32XoKq+5Jz/qwu+noJ pzIGquHrFeH3YKF4ztzPlO7Xjs1LfShtvwJhUjoUaGMafVm9tGfZQnEX6ThCVwCdN0 WhXzrJbGBgED8o2ZaPr4TNDZ6AGbyAn1UyOLM7XQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Bjorn Helgaas , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.6 103/530] atm: iphase: Do PCI error checks on own line Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:44:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20231124172031.255011253@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20231124172028.107505484@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231124172028.107505484@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ilpo Järvinen [ Upstream commit c28742447ca9879b52fbaf022ad844f0ffcd749c ] In get_esi() PCI errors are checked inside line-split "if" conditions (in addition to the file not following the coding style). To make the code in get_esi() more readable, fix the coding style and use the usual error handling pattern with a separate variable. In addition, initialization of 'error' variable at declaration is not needed. No functional changes intended. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911125354.25501-4-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/atm/iphase.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/atm/iphase.c b/drivers/atm/iphase.c index 3241486869530..9bba8f280a4d4 100644 --- a/drivers/atm/iphase.c +++ b/drivers/atm/iphase.c @@ -2291,19 +2291,21 @@ static int get_esi(struct atm_dev *dev) static int reset_sar(struct atm_dev *dev) { IADEV *iadev; - int i, error = 1; + int i, error; unsigned int pci[64]; iadev = INPH_IA_DEV(dev); - for(i=0; i<64; i++) - if ((error = pci_read_config_dword(iadev->pci, - i*4, &pci[i])) != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) - return error; + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) { + error = pci_read_config_dword(iadev->pci, i * 4, &pci[i]); + if (error != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) + return error; + } writel(0, iadev->reg+IPHASE5575_EXT_RESET); - for(i=0; i<64; i++) - if ((error = pci_write_config_dword(iadev->pci, - i*4, pci[i])) != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) - return error; + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) { + error = pci_write_config_dword(iadev->pci, i * 4, pci[i]); + if (error != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) + return error; + } udelay(5); return 0; } -- 2.42.0