From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8399BB65C; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 15:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="r8U/vD7V" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 872B6C433C7; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 15:53:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1700927598; bh=al+G0rriiHu1mo6bmsIUbIhr6a/3qzbcnyBNXYRyZC8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=r8U/vD7VrZxIR+HnhzkI56te2jE8QiD3+9kFourtDRrbOYMt3tfmI8cAASWmC8PhY eN+Kg9NYTNeToCoW3i7/S/gmJhlDU0FozTS0GwlTABfgz0UvA58x98HIxPhAMsWnjy R7oSlqzppmywGFGMSgCIufjIfbVXW6R+rANBxhAE= Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 15:53:15 +0000 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, chrubis@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/297] 5.15.140-rc1 review Message-ID: <2023112502-supernova-copier-7615@gregkh> References: <20231124172000.087816911@linuxfoundation.org> <81a11ebe-ea47-4e21-b5eb-536b1a723168@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <81a11ebe-ea47-4e21-b5eb-536b1a723168@linaro.org> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:45:09PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > Hello! > > On 24/11/23 11:50 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.140 release. > > There are 297 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.140-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > We are noticing a regression with ltp-syscalls' preadv03: > > -----8<----- > preadv03 preadv03 > preadv03_64 preadv03_64 > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly > preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 > preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 > ----->8----- > > This is seen in the following environments: > * dragonboard-845c > * juno-64k_page_size > * qemu-arm64 > * qemu-armv7 > * qemu-i386 > * qemu-x86_64 > * x86_64-clang > > and on the following RC's: > * v5.10.202-rc1 > * v5.15.140-rc1 > * v6.1.64-rc1 > > (Note that the list might not be complete, because some branches failed to execute completely due to build issues reported elsewhere.) > > Bisection in linux-5.15.y pointed to: > > commit db85c7fff122c14bc5755e47b51fbfafae660235 > Author: Jan Kara > Date: Fri Oct 13 14:13:50 2023 +0200 > > ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO > commit 91562895f8030cb9a0470b1db49de79346a69f91 upstream. > > > Reverting that commit made the test pass. Odd. I'll go drop that from 5.10.y and 5.15.y now, thanks. greg k-h