From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE1FB65C; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 15:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="1K49k+8b" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28C6BC433C8; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 15:44:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1700927041; bh=Qrz9Crgta9Wt7b9qZI13jZ8oudgxdLa/S94YLvc+XqQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=1K49k+8bHI4mY3R93lxy0uTAITjIjXEf0g26QcEJ6JQiD2xatWKZ2+/iCoKdhVwYl Co53cSyy21YWEXG/xjwQjUP4ZcNksh/PccmhV24AG0/xxVzrq5Pk4haknovu5qsTkE b4ntEf4VtNvNnmhZYl2+2BQi1MBfM2B8ebsa42h4= Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 15:43:59 +0000 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/97] 4.19.300-rc1 review Message-ID: <2023112526-launder-slashed-ab21@gregkh> References: <20231124171934.122298957@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 01:13:33PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > Hello! > > On 24/11/23 11:49 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.300 release. > > There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.300-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > We see this failure on Arm32: > -----8<----- > /builds/linux/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c: In function 'meson_uart_probe': > /builds/linux/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c:728:13: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member named 'has_sysrq' > 728 | port->has_sysrq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_MESON_CONSOLE); > | ^~ > make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:303: drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.o] Error 1 > ----->8----- Thanks, now fixed. > And this one on Arm64: > -----8<----- > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c: In function 'profile_dead_cpu': > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c:346:27: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'prof_cpu_mask' will never be NULL [-Waddress] > 346 | if (prof_cpu_mask != NULL) > | ^~ > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c:49:22: note: 'prof_cpu_mask' declared here > 49 | static cpumask_var_t prof_cpu_mask; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c: In function 'profile_online_cpu': > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c:383:27: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'prof_cpu_mask' will never be NULL [-Waddress] > 383 | if (prof_cpu_mask != NULL) > | ^~ > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c:49:22: note: 'prof_cpu_mask' declared here > 49 | static cpumask_var_t prof_cpu_mask; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c: In function 'profile_tick': > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c:413:47: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'prof_cpu_mask' will never be NULL [-Waddress] > 413 | if (!user_mode(regs) && prof_cpu_mask != NULL && > | ^~ > /builds/linux/kernel/profile.c:49:22: note: 'prof_cpu_mask' declared here > 49 | static cpumask_var_t prof_cpu_mask; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ----->8----- Is this new? No code in this -rc touches this file, or prof_cpu_mask that I can tell. Hints for what went wrong would be appreciated... thanks, greg k-h