From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06BD946BBB for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 19:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="aIiTdymS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AA71C433C7; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 19:30:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1701199836; bh=lXatMCCChhhmktfYNo6tMyEuByDsuZMc7G+9uhfCyz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aIiTdymSvXObOZ46h3uRmspQQ/WdPLdG6Hvam/4t219Nehx7xAWosk90BCYrX/ggo /0rMhvSe9IK0yDEoDtX2x4hhr3Q0AJ2Iwcfr1oVYoqUJ7oV3zGz8xwSMWgPbvbJF3W pU0zOy5rO/bCSpmQ46uOYVTp4qtjliIG3qc5ATxk= Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 19:30:34 +0000 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Valenduc Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net, jslaby@suse.cz Subject: Re: Linux 6.1.64 Message-ID: <2023112854-filth-diaper-1a20@gregkh> References: <2023112826-glitter-onion-8533@gregkh> <7f07bb2d-bb00-4774-8cc0-d66b7210380c@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7f07bb2d-bb00-4774-8cc0-d66b7210380c@gmail.com> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 08:22:22PM +0100, François Valenduc wrote: > Build fails on my baremetal server on scaleway: > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:215:20: note: previous definition of > ‘evmptr_is_valid’ with type ‘bool(u64)’ {aka ‘_Bool(long long unsigned > int)’} > 215 | static inline bool evmptr_is_valid(u64 evmptr) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:184:6: error: redeclaration of ‘enum > nested_evmptrld_status’ > 184 | enum nested_evmptrld_status { > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:220:6: note: originally defined here > 220 | enum nested_evmptrld_status { > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:185:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator > ‘EVMPTRLD_DISABLED’ > 185 | EVMPTRLD_DISABLED, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:221:9: note: previous definition of > ‘EVMPTRLD_DISABLED’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’ > 221 | EVMPTRLD_DISABLED, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:186:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator > ‘EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED’ > 186 | EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:222:9: note: previous definition of > ‘EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’ > 222 | EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:187:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator > ‘EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL’ > 187 | EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:223:9: note: previous definition of > ‘EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’ > 223 | EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:188:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator > ‘EVMPTRLD_ERROR’ > 188 | EVMPTRLD_ERROR, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:224:9: note: previous definition of > ‘EVMPTRLD_ERROR’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’ > 224 | EVMPTRLD_ERROR, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/x86/kvm] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/x86] Error 2 > > The configuration file is attached. Kernel 6.1.62 compiled fine. > Does somebody have an idea about this ? That's odd, any chance you can run 'git bisect' to track down the offending commit? thanks, greg k-h