From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BCB0524C2; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="0T6D/b05" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28DAEC433C8; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:26:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1701361560; bh=uPz9j5JIaDb3BJ7vPvPbSNNjZLkRSzjvnvdv9Jexcc4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0T6D/b058VzBkrK1Sq29aR/R/maUua3I2ps1gtsbE4eZYjgxAlJoC+UVln8YU+XC7 fUyOsitzqCyavOLMmJvqX0YaYptWFp209CdpnU1wk3/3p/U+6GxnsjJi3sHgwc7Vgm MQP3QXE7mu0wiJhTQDW87C8/hzI/j7XEvHfexYEc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Zheng Wang , Coly Li , Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 6.6 070/112] bcache: replace a mistaken IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in btree_gc_coalesce() Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:21:57 +0000 Message-ID: <20231130162142.549064048@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20231130162140.298098091@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231130162140.298098091@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Coly Li commit f72f4312d4388376fc8a1f6cf37cb21a0d41758b upstream. Commit 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in node allocations") do the following change inside btree_gc_coalesce(), 31 @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce( 32 memset(new_nodes, 0, sizeof(new_nodes)); 33 closure_init_stack(&cl); 34 35 - while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r[nodes].b)) 36 + while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR(r[nodes].b)) 37 keys += r[nodes++].keys; 38 39 blocks = btree_default_blocks(b->c) * 2 / 3; At line 35 the original r[nodes].b is not always allocatored from __bch_btree_node_alloc(), and possibly initialized as NULL pointer by caller of btree_gc_coalesce(). Therefore the change at line 36 is not correct. This patch replaces the mistaken IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to avoid potential issue. Fixes: 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in node allocations") Cc: # 6.5+ Cc: Zheng Wang Signed-off-by: Coly Li Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-9-colyli@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btre memset(new_nodes, 0, sizeof(new_nodes)); closure_init_stack(&cl); - while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR(r[nodes].b)) + while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r[nodes].b)) keys += r[nodes++].keys; blocks = btree_default_blocks(b->c) * 2 / 3;