From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mhiramat@kernel.org,inwardvessel@gmail.com,lkp@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 13:52:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023120321-emboss-bunion-bf59@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023120321-emboss-bunion-bf59@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
a1461f1fd6cf ("rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler")
4bbd93455659 ("kprobes: kretprobe scalability improvement")
8865aea0471c ("kernel: kprobes: Use struct_size()")
195b9cb5b288 ("fprobe: Ensure running fprobe_exit_handler() finished before calling rethook_free()")
5f81018753df ("fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered")
76d0de5729c0 ("fprobe: Pass entry_data to handlers")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 14:53:56 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler
Since the rethook::handler is an RCU-maganged pointer so that it will
notice readers the rethook is stopped (unregistered) or not, it should
be an __rcu pointer and use appropriate functions to be accessed. This
will use appropriate memory barrier when accessing it. OTOH,
rethook::data is never changed, so we don't need to check it in
get_kretprobe().
NOTE: To avoid sparse warning, rethook::handler is defined by a raw
function pointer type with __rcu instead of rethook_handler_t.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/170126066201.398836.837498688669005979.stgit@devnote2/
Fixes: 54ecbe6f1ed5 ("rethook: Add a generic return hook")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311241808.rv9ceuAh-lkp@intel.com/
Tested-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
index 64672bace560..0ff44d6633e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
@@ -197,10 +197,8 @@ extern int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBE_ON_RETHOOK
static nokprobe_inline struct kretprobe *get_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri)
{
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(),
- "Kretprobe is accessed from instance under preemptive context");
-
- return (struct kretprobe *)READ_ONCE(ri->node.rethook->data);
+ /* rethook::data is non-changed field, so that you can access it freely. */
+ return (struct kretprobe *)ri->node.rethook->data;
}
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long get_kretprobe_retaddr(struct kretprobe_instance *ri)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/rethook.h b/include/linux/rethook.h
index ce69b2b7bc35..ba60962805f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/rethook.h
+++ b/include/linux/rethook.h
@@ -28,7 +28,12 @@ typedef void (*rethook_handler_t) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long,
*/
struct rethook {
void *data;
- rethook_handler_t handler;
+ /*
+ * To avoid sparse warnings, this uses a raw function pointer with
+ * __rcu, instead of rethook_handler_t. But this must be same as
+ * rethook_handler_t.
+ */
+ void (__rcu *handler) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long, struct pt_regs *);
struct objpool_head pool;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
diff --git a/kernel/trace/rethook.c b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
index 6fd7d4ecbbc6..fa03094e9e69 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/rethook.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void rethook_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
*/
void rethook_stop(struct rethook *rh)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(rh->handler, NULL);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rh->handler, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void rethook_stop(struct rethook *rh)
*/
void rethook_free(struct rethook *rh)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(rh->handler, NULL);
+ rethook_stop(rh);
call_rcu(&rh->rcu, rethook_free_rcu);
}
@@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ static int rethook_fini_pool(struct objpool_head *head, void *context)
return 0;
}
+static inline rethook_handler_t rethook_get_handler(struct rethook *rh)
+{
+ return (rethook_handler_t)rcu_dereference_check(rh->handler,
+ rcu_read_lock_any_held());
+}
+
/**
* rethook_alloc() - Allocate struct rethook.
* @data: a data to pass the @handler when hooking the return.
@@ -107,7 +113,7 @@ struct rethook *rethook_alloc(void *data, rethook_handler_t handler,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
rh->data = data;
- rh->handler = handler;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rh->handler, handler);
/* initialize the objpool for rethook nodes */
if (objpool_init(&rh->pool, num, size, GFP_KERNEL, rh,
@@ -135,9 +141,10 @@ static void free_rethook_node_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
*/
void rethook_recycle(struct rethook_node *node)
{
- lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
+ rethook_handler_t handler;
- if (likely(READ_ONCE(node->rethook->handler)))
+ handler = rethook_get_handler(node->rethook);
+ if (likely(handler))
objpool_push(node, &node->rethook->pool);
else
call_rcu(&node->rcu, free_rethook_node_rcu);
@@ -153,9 +160,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rethook_recycle);
*/
struct rethook_node *rethook_try_get(struct rethook *rh)
{
- rethook_handler_t handler = READ_ONCE(rh->handler);
-
- lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
+ rethook_handler_t handler = rethook_get_handler(rh);
/* Check whether @rh is going to be freed. */
if (unlikely(!handler))
@@ -300,7 +305,7 @@ unsigned long rethook_trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs,
rhn = container_of(first, struct rethook_node, llist);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rhn->frame != frame))
break;
- handler = READ_ONCE(rhn->rethook->handler);
+ handler = rethook_get_handler(rhn->rethook);
if (handler)
handler(rhn, rhn->rethook->data,
correct_ret_addr, regs);
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-03 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-03 12:52 gregkh [this message]
2023-12-06 1:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler mhiramat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023120321-emboss-bunion-bf59@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox