* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-12-05 21:48 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:18 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-12-05 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml
On 12/5/23 11:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.263-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-05 21:48 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-12-06 11:18 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-12-06 11:49 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2023-12-06 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 06/12/23 12:52 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.263-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-05 21:48 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:18 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2023-12-06 11:49 ` Jon Hunter
2023-12-06 13:15 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-12-06 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
stable
On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 04:22:16 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.263-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail
54 tests: 54 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.263-rc3-g97430ed51c91
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-06 11:49 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-12-06 13:15 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-12-06 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-12-06 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 00:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.263-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.263-rc3
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 97430ed51c915b4a8037655ac6656a644fd42e9e
* git describe: v5.4.262-91-g97430ed51c91
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.262-91-g97430ed51c91
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.262)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.262)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.262)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.262)
## Test result summary
total: 90072, pass: 70700, fail: 2384, skip: 16945, xfail: 43
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 148 total, 129 passed, 19 failed
* arm64: 47 total, 45 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 30 total, 24 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-06 13:15 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-12-06 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
2023-12-06 18:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-12-08 18:09 ` Guenter Roeck
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-06 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Shuah Khan
On 12/5/23 12:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.263-rc3.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-06 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-12-06 18:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-12-08 18:09 ` Guenter Roeck
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-12-06 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:22:16AM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 152 pass: 152 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 462 pass: 462 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-05 19:22 [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-06 18:44 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-12-08 18:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-12-11 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
6 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-12-08 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On 12/5/23 11:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
[ ... ]
> Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> btrfs: add dmesg output for first mount and last unmount of a filesystem
>
This patch results in the following code in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:open_ctree():
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
... (no access to disk_super)
btrfs_info(fs_info, "first mount of filesystem %pU", disk_super->fsid);
which I would assume _should_ result in btrfs crashes. No idea why that isn't
actually happening or why gcc doesn't complain. Building allmodconfig with
clang does complain, but doesn't bail out.
s/btrfs/disk-io.c:2832:55: warning: variable 'disk_super' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
btrfs_info(fs_info, "first mount of filesystem %pU", disk_super->fsid);
^~~~~~~~~~
The actual log output is:
[ 7.302427] BTRFS info (device nvme0n1): first mount of filesystem (efault)
It might be a good idea to either revert this patch or fix it up
(though I don't know how to fix it up).
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.263-rc3 review
2023-12-08 18:09 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-12-11 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-12-11 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:09:17AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/5/23 11:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.263 release.
> > There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:32:16 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> [ ... ]
> > Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> > btrfs: add dmesg output for first mount and last unmount of a filesystem
> >
>
> This patch results in the following code in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:open_ctree():
>
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
> ... (no access to disk_super)
> btrfs_info(fs_info, "first mount of filesystem %pU", disk_super->fsid);
>
> which I would assume _should_ result in btrfs crashes. No idea why that isn't
> actually happening or why gcc doesn't complain. Building allmodconfig with
> clang does complain, but doesn't bail out.
>
> s/btrfs/disk-io.c:2832:55: warning: variable 'disk_super' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
> btrfs_info(fs_info, "first mount of filesystem %pU", disk_super->fsid);
> ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> The actual log output is:
>
> [ 7.302427] BTRFS info (device nvme0n1): first mount of filesystem (efault)
>
> It might be a good idea to either revert this patch or fix it up
> (though I don't know how to fix it up).
yeah, that doesn't look good, now reverted, thanks!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread