From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 7/8] ring-buffer: Force absolute timestamp on discard of event
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 21:37:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207023820.509376496@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231207023752.712829638@goodmis.org
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
There's a race where if an event is discarded from the ring buffer and an
interrupt were to happen at that time and insert an event, the time stamp
is still used from the discarded event as an offset. This can screw up the
timings.
If the event is going to be discarded, set the "before_stamp" to zero.
When a new event comes in, it compares the "before_stamp" with the
"write_stamp" and if they are not equal, it will insert an absolute
timestamp. This will prevent the timings from getting out of sync due to
the discarded event.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231206100244.5130f9b3@gandalf.local.home
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Fixes: 6f6be606e763f ("ring-buffer: Force before_stamp and write_stamp to be different on discard")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 43cc47d7faaf..a6da2d765c78 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -3030,22 +3030,19 @@ rb_try_to_discard(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
local_read(&bpage->write) & ~RB_WRITE_MASK;
unsigned long event_length = rb_event_length(event);
+ /*
+ * For the before_stamp to be different than the write_stamp
+ * to make sure that the next event adds an absolute
+ * value and does not rely on the saved write stamp, which
+ * is now going to be bogus.
+ */
+ rb_time_set(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp, 0);
+
/* Something came in, can't discard */
if (!rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp,
write_stamp, write_stamp - delta))
return false;
- /*
- * It's possible that the event time delta is zero
- * (has the same time stamp as the previous event)
- * in which case write_stamp and before_stamp could
- * be the same. In such a case, force before_stamp
- * to be different than write_stamp. It doesn't
- * matter what it is, as long as its different.
- */
- if (!delta)
- rb_time_set(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp, 0);
-
/*
* If an event were to come in now, it would see that the
* write_stamp and the before_stamp are different, and assume
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20231207023752.712829638@goodmis.org>
2023-12-07 2:37 ` [for-linus][PATCH 1/8] tracing: Always update snapshot buffer size Steven Rostedt
2023-12-07 2:37 ` [for-linus][PATCH 2/8] tracing: Stop current tracer when resizing buffer Steven Rostedt
2023-12-07 2:37 ` [for-linus][PATCH 3/8] tracing: Disable snapshot buffer when stopping instance tracers Steven Rostedt
2023-12-07 2:37 ` [for-linus][PATCH 4/8] tracing: Fix incomplete locking when disabling buffered events Steven Rostedt
2023-12-07 2:37 ` [for-linus][PATCH 6/8] tracing: Fix a possible race " Steven Rostedt
2023-12-07 2:37 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-12-07 2:38 ` [for-linus][PATCH 8/8] ring-buffer: Test last update in 32bit version of __rb_time_read() Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231207023820.509376496@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox