From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE4163C2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="lVwpk+9R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDA70C433C7; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:34:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1702478076; bh=vHOm7JL/I9P+W4e+R3B8sE5/YtDRdgWrEVkHonMsDEU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lVwpk+9R0dfVVT+Zv23YTpmZkQ5rwTkr72jRIApxtueSmfkOLJXuk32fJduqdgz+k EKPSZ8Du6tm2gdNnUWgnZ1tGA+VEiK1T6MPT8Pbieo/PWTiVIAzFhnfJ8ljjpvtclC muQNs9+gfZyo+yusvmi8ZxNlR/n0XTELK8XgoscM= Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:34:32 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Namjae Jeon , Steve French , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: linux-5.15.y ksmbd backport for CVE-2023-38431 Message-ID: <2023121344-scorebook-doily-5050@gregkh> References: <20231212184745.2245187-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <2023121241-pope-fragility-edad@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: linux-5.15.y ksmbd backport for CVE-2023-38431] On 12/12/2023 (Tue 21:04) Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 01:47:44PM -0500, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com wrote: > > > From: Paul Gortmaker > > > > > > This is a bit long, but I've never touched this code and all I can do is > > > compile test it. So the below basically represents a capture of my > > > thought process in fixing this for the v5.15.y-stable branch. > > > > Nice work, but really, given that there are _SO_ many ksmb patches that > > have NOT been backported to 5.15.y, I would strongly recommend that we > > just mark the thing as depending on BROKEN there for now as your one > > I'd be 100% fine with that. Can't speak for anyone else though. > > > backport here is not going to make a dent in the fixes that need to be > > applied there to resolve the known issues that the codebase currently > > has resolved in newer kernels. > > > > Do you use this codebase on 5.15.y? What drove you to want to backport > > I don't use it, and I don't know of anyone who does. Then why are you all backporting stuff for it? If no one steps up, I'll just mark the thing as broken, it is _so_ far behind in patches that it's just sad. thanks, greg k-h