From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 06/15] ring-buffer: Do not update before stamp when switching sub-buffers
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 23:22:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231216042243.383892237@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231216042214.905262999@goodmis.org
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The ring buffer timestamps are synchronized by two timestamp placeholders.
One is the "before_stamp" and the other is the "write_stamp" (sometimes
referred to as the "after stamp" but only in the comments. These two
stamps are key to knowing how to handle nested events coming in with a
lockless system.
When moving across sub-buffers, the before stamp is updated but the write
stamp is not. There's an effort to put back the before stamp to something
that seems logical in case there's nested events. But as the current event
is about to cross sub-buffers, and so will any new nested event that happens,
updating the before stamp is useless, and could even introduce new race
conditions.
The first event on a sub-buffer simply uses the sub-buffer's timestamp
and keeps a "delta" of zero. The "before_stamp" and "write_stamp" are not
used in the algorithm in this case. There's no reason to try to fix the
before_stamp when this happens.
As a bonus, it removes a cmpxchg() when crossing sub-buffers!
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231211114420.36dde01b@gandalf.local.home
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Fixes: a389d86f7fd09 ("ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp")
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index dcd47895b424..c7abcc215fe2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -3607,14 +3607,7 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
/* See if we shot pass the end of this buffer page */
if (unlikely(write > BUF_PAGE_SIZE)) {
- /* before and after may now different, fix it up*/
- b_ok = rb_time_read(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp, &info->before);
- a_ok = rb_time_read(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp, &info->after);
- if (a_ok && b_ok && info->before != info->after)
- (void)rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->before_stamp,
- info->before, info->after);
- if (a_ok && b_ok)
- check_buffer(cpu_buffer, info, CHECK_FULL_PAGE);
+ check_buffer(cpu_buffer, info, CHECK_FULL_PAGE);
return rb_move_tail(cpu_buffer, tail, info);
}
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-16 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20231216042214.905262999@goodmis.org>
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 01/15] ring-buffer: Fix writing to the buffer with max_data_size Steven Rostedt
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 04/15] ring-buffer: Fix memory leak of free page Steven Rostedt
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 05/15] tracing: Update snapshot buffer on resize if it is allocated Steven Rostedt
2023-12-16 4:22 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 07/15] ring-buffer: Have saved event hold the entire event Steven Rostedt
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 10/15] ring-buffer: Do not try to put back write_stamp Steven Rostedt
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 12/15] ring-buffer: Fix a race in rb_time_cmpxchg() for 32 bit archs Steven Rostedt
2023-12-16 4:22 ` [for-linus][PATCH 14/15] ring-buffer: Have rb_time_cmpxchg() set the msb counter too Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231216042243.383892237@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox