From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FFA74237E; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="0KBjjXL0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECFB0C433CB; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:00:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1702908002; bh=cOi7AblVtvqC3udD0cZyQaiUKYucwcnAm0SU9spYivs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0KBjjXL0oIjwTQkUYsBY9Y7Ks0fqTSALXud1cvew7GF6qS3GSMIqt+MEFmMC6pa4J LWRvNY7fpBBQOgbsi8LjfsBzur+aeunqXyfzbWSuWp1SCzWeHv8zf8azI5Wsb9wNxd 2+t/rBk0zy/Wm8/aK+wRRVwJHZHYZGuz8hvu4lpY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Gavin Li , Gavi Teitz , Saeed Mahameed , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.6 018/166] net/mlx5e: Check netdev pointer before checking its net ns Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:49:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20231218135105.751161323@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20231218135104.927894164@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231218135104.927894164@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Gavin Li [ Upstream commit 7aaf975238c47b710fcc4eca0da1e7902a53abe2 ] Previously, when comparing the net namespaces, the case where the netdev doesn't exist wasn't taken into account, and therefore can cause a crash. In such a case, the comparing function should return false, as there is no netdev->net to compare the devlink->net to. Furthermore, this will result in an attempt to enter switchdev mode without a netdev to fail, and which is the desired result as there is no meaning in switchdev mode without a net device. Fixes: 662404b24a4c ("net/mlx5e: Block entering switchdev mode with ns inconsistency") Signed-off-by: Gavin Li Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c index bf78eeca401be..bb8bcb448ae90 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c @@ -3653,14 +3653,18 @@ static int esw_inline_mode_to_devlink(u8 mlx5_mode, u8 *mode) static bool esw_offloads_devlink_ns_eq_netdev_ns(struct devlink *devlink) { + struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink); struct net *devl_net, *netdev_net; - struct mlx5_eswitch *esw; - - esw = mlx5_devlink_eswitch_nocheck_get(devlink); - netdev_net = dev_net(esw->dev->mlx5e_res.uplink_netdev); - devl_net = devlink_net(devlink); + bool ret = false; - return net_eq(devl_net, netdev_net); + mutex_lock(&dev->mlx5e_res.uplink_netdev_lock); + if (dev->mlx5e_res.uplink_netdev) { + netdev_net = dev_net(dev->mlx5e_res.uplink_netdev); + devl_net = devlink_net(devlink); + ret = net_eq(devl_net, netdev_net); + } + mutex_unlock(&dev->mlx5e_res.uplink_netdev_lock); + return ret; } int mlx5_eswitch_block_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) -- 2.43.0