[PATCH 5.15.y 045/154] ksmbd: use wait_event instead of schedule_timeout()

[Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>]

[ Upstream commit a14c573870a664386adc10526a6c2648ea56dae1 ]

ksmbd threads eating masses of cputime when connection is disconnected.
If connection is disconnected, ksmbd thread waits for pending requests
to be processed using schedule_timeout. schedule_timeout() incorrectly
is used, and it is more efficient to use wait_event/wake_up than to check
r_count every time with timeout.

Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
---
 fs/ksmbd/connection.c |  6 +++---
 fs/ksmbd/connection.h |  1 +
 fs/ksmbd/oplock.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 fs/ksmbd/server.c     |  8 +++++++-
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/connection.c b/fs/ksmbd/connection.c
index 192646b8920e..be1f8ffa4a78 100644
--- a/fs/ksmbd/connection.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/connection.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct ksmbd_conn *ksmbd_conn_alloc(void)
 	conn->outstanding_credits = 0;
 
 	init_waitqueue_head(&conn->req_running_q);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&conn->r_count_q);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->conns_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->requests);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->async_requests);
@@ -165,7 +166,6 @@ int ksmbd_conn_write(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 	struct kvec iov[3];
 	int iov_idx = 0;
 
-	ksmbd_conn_try_dequeue_request(work);
 	if (!work->response_buf) {
 		pr_err("NULL response header\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ int ksmbd_conn_handler_loop(void *p)
 
 out:
 	/* Wait till all reference dropped to the Server object*/
-	while (atomic_read(&conn->r_count) > 0)
-		schedule_timeout(HZ);
+	wait_event(conn->r_count_q, atomic_read(&conn->r_count) == 0);
+
 
 	unload_nls(conn->local_nls);
 	if (default_conn_ops.terminate_fn)
diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/connection.h b/fs/ksmbd/connection.h
index e0a25cddbb29..a8c367c481e8 100644
--- a/fs/ksmbd/connection.h
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/connection.h
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct ksmbd_conn {
 	unsigned int			outstanding_credits;
 	spinlock_t			credits_lock;
 	wait_queue_head_t		req_running_q;
+	wait_queue_head_t		r_count_q;
 	/* Lock to protect requests list*/
 	spinlock_t			request_lock;
 	struct list_head		requests;
diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c b/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c
index ae5fc4b2c133..b527f451d7a4 100644
--- a/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c
@@ -616,18 +616,13 @@ static void __smb2_oplock_break_noti(struct work_struct *wk)
 	struct ksmbd_file *fp;
 
 	fp = ksmbd_lookup_durable_fd(br_info->fid);
-	if (!fp) {
-		atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
-		ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
-		return;
-	}
+	if (!fp)
+		goto out;
 
 	if (allocate_oplock_break_buf(work)) {
 		pr_err("smb2_allocate_rsp_buf failed! ");
-		atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
 		ksmbd_fd_put(work, fp);
-		ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
-		return;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	rsp_hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->response_buf);
@@ -668,8 +663,16 @@ static void __smb2_oplock_break_noti(struct work_struct *wk)
 
 	ksmbd_fd_put(work, fp);
 	ksmbd_conn_write(work);
+
+out:
 	ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
-	atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
+	/*
+	 * Checking waitqueue to dropping pending requests on
+	 * disconnection. waitqueue_active is safe because it
+	 * uses atomic operation for condition.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic_dec_return(&conn->r_count) && waitqueue_active(&conn->r_count_q))
+		wake_up(&conn->r_count_q);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -732,9 +735,7 @@ static void __smb2_lease_break_noti(struct work_struct *wk)
 
 	if (allocate_oplock_break_buf(work)) {
 		ksmbd_debug(OPLOCK, "smb2_allocate_rsp_buf failed! ");
-		ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
-		atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
-		return;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	rsp_hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->response_buf);
@@ -772,8 +773,16 @@ static void __smb2_lease_break_noti(struct work_struct *wk)
 	inc_rfc1001_len(work->response_buf, 44);
 
 	ksmbd_conn_write(work);
+
+out:
 	ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
-	atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
+	/*
+	 * Checking waitqueue to dropping pending requests on
+	 * disconnection. waitqueue_active is safe because it
+	 * uses atomic operation for condition.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic_dec_return(&conn->r_count) && waitqueue_active(&conn->r_count_q))
+		wake_up(&conn->r_count_q);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/server.c b/fs/ksmbd/server.c
index 049d68831ccd..1d5e46d71070 100644
--- a/fs/ksmbd/server.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/server.c
@@ -266,7 +266,13 @@ static void handle_ksmbd_work(struct work_struct *wk)
 
 	ksmbd_conn_try_dequeue_request(work);
 	ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
-	atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
+	/*
+	 * Checking waitqueue to dropping pending requests on
+	 * disconnection. waitqueue_active is safe because it
+	 * uses atomic operation for condition.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic_dec_return(&conn->r_count) && waitqueue_active(&conn->r_count_q))
+		wake_up(&conn->r_count_q);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1