From: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
To: mchehab@kernel.org, hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, mcgrof@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@outlook.com, Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] [media] xc4000: Fix atomicity violation in xc4000_get_frequency
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 13:50:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231222055030.5237-1-2045gemini@gmail.com> (raw)
In xc4000_get_frequency():
*freq = priv->freq_hz + priv->freq_offset;
The code accesses priv->freq_hz and priv->freq_offset without holding any
lock.
In xc4000_set_params():
// Code that updates priv->freq_hz and priv->freq_offset
...
xc4000_get_frequency() and xc4000_set_params() may execute concurrently,
risking inconsistent reads of priv->freq_hz and priv->freq_offset. Since
these related data may update during reading, it can result in incorrect
frequency calculation, leading to atomicity violations.
This possible bug is found by an experimental static analysis tool
developed by our team, BassCheck[1]. This tool analyzes the locking APIs
to extract function pairs that can be concurrently executed, and then
analyzes the instructions in the paired functions to identify possible
concurrency bugs including data races and atomicity violations. The above
possible bug is reported when our tool analyzes the source code of
Linux 6.2.
To address this issue, it is proposed to add a mutex lock pair in
xc4000_get_frequency() to ensure atomicity. With this patch applied, our
tool no longer reports the possible bug, with the kernel configuration
allyesconfig for x86_64. Due to the lack of associated hardware, we cannot
test the patch in runtime testing, and just verify it according to the
code logic.
[1] https://sites.google.com/view/basscheck/
Fixes: 4c07e32884ab6 ("[media] xc4000: Fix get_frequency()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
---
v2:
* In this patch v2, we've added some information of the static analysis
tool used, as per the researcher guidelines. Also, we've added a cc in the
signed-off-by area, according to the stable-kernel-rules.
Thank Greg KH for helpful advice.
---
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c b/drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c
index 57ded9ff3f04..29bc63021c5a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c
@@ -1515,10 +1515,10 @@ static int xc4000_get_frequency(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 *freq)
{
struct xc4000_priv *priv = fe->tuner_priv;
+ mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
*freq = priv->freq_hz + priv->freq_offset;
if (debug) {
- mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
if ((priv->cur_fw.type
& (BASE | FM | DTV6 | DTV7 | DTV78 | DTV8)) == BASE) {
u16 snr = 0;
@@ -1529,8 +1529,8 @@ static int xc4000_get_frequency(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 *freq)
return 0;
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-22 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 5:50 Gui-Dong Han [this message]
2024-01-11 1:38 ` [PATCH v2] [media] xc4000: Fix atomicity violation in xc4000_get_frequency Gui-Dong Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231222055030.5237-1-2045gemini@gmail.com \
--to=2045gemini@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@outlook.com \
--cc=bass@buaa.edu.cn \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox