From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,yury.norov@gmail.com
Subject: patch "serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines bitfield in case of" added to tty-testing
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 16:33:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024010454-ramble-scrubbed-41fb@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines bitfield in case of
to my tty git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git
in the tty-testing branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will be merged to the tty-next branch sometime soon,
after it passes testing, and the merge window is open.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 8a1060ce974919f2a79807527ad82ac39336eda2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:18:08 -0500
Subject: serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines bitfield in case of
probe error
If an error occurs during probing, the sc16is7xx_lines bitfield may be left
in a state that doesn't represent the correct state of lines allocation.
For example, in a system with two SC16 devices, if an error occurs only
during probing of channel (port) B of the second device, sc16is7xx_lines
final state will be 00001011b instead of the expected 00000011b.
This is caused in part because of the "i--" in the for/loop located in
the out_ports: error path.
Fix this by checking the return value of uart_add_one_port() and set line
allocation bit only if this was successful. This allows the refactor of
the obfuscated for(i--...) loop in the error path, and properly call
uart_remove_one_port() only when needed, and properly unset line allocation
bits.
Also use same mechanism in remove() when calling uart_remove_one_port().
Fixes: c64349722d14 ("sc16is7xx: support multiple devices")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231221231823.2327894-2-hugo@hugovil.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c | 44 ++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
index e40e4a99277e..17b90f971f96 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
@@ -407,19 +407,6 @@ static void sc16is7xx_port_update(struct uart_port *port, u8 reg,
regmap_update_bits(one->regmap, reg, mask, val);
}
-static int sc16is7xx_alloc_line(void)
-{
- int i;
-
- BUILD_BUG_ON(SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS > BITS_PER_LONG);
-
- for (i = 0; i < SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS; i++)
- if (!test_and_set_bit(i, &sc16is7xx_lines))
- break;
-
- return i;
-}
-
static void sc16is7xx_power(struct uart_port *port, int on)
{
sc16is7xx_port_update(port, SC16IS7XX_IER_REG,
@@ -1550,6 +1537,13 @@ static int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev,
SC16IS7XX_IOCONTROL_SRESET_BIT);
for (i = 0; i < devtype->nr_uart; ++i) {
+ s->p[i].port.line = find_first_zero_bit(&sc16is7xx_lines,
+ SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS);
+ if (s->p[i].port.line >= SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS) {
+ ret = -ERANGE;
+ goto out_ports;
+ }
+
/* Initialize port data */
s->p[i].port.dev = dev;
s->p[i].port.irq = irq;
@@ -1569,14 +1563,8 @@ static int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev,
s->p[i].port.rs485_supported = sc16is7xx_rs485_supported;
s->p[i].port.ops = &sc16is7xx_ops;
s->p[i].old_mctrl = 0;
- s->p[i].port.line = sc16is7xx_alloc_line();
s->p[i].regmap = regmaps[i];
- if (s->p[i].port.line >= SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_ports;
- }
-
mutex_init(&s->p[i].efr_lock);
ret = uart_get_rs485_mode(&s->p[i].port);
@@ -1594,8 +1582,13 @@ static int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev,
kthread_init_work(&s->p[i].tx_work, sc16is7xx_tx_proc);
kthread_init_work(&s->p[i].reg_work, sc16is7xx_reg_proc);
kthread_init_delayed_work(&s->p[i].ms_work, sc16is7xx_ms_proc);
+
/* Register port */
- uart_add_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
+ ret = uart_add_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_ports;
+
+ set_bit(s->p[i].port.line, &sc16is7xx_lines);
/* Enable EFR */
sc16is7xx_port_write(&s->p[i].port, SC16IS7XX_LCR_REG,
@@ -1653,10 +1646,9 @@ static int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev,
#endif
out_ports:
- for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
- uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
- clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, &sc16is7xx_lines);
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < devtype->nr_uart; i++)
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, &sc16is7xx_lines))
+ uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
kthread_stop(s->kworker_task);
@@ -1678,8 +1670,8 @@ static void sc16is7xx_remove(struct device *dev)
for (i = 0; i < s->devtype->nr_uart; i++) {
kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&s->p[i].ms_work);
- uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
- clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, &sc16is7xx_lines);
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, &sc16is7xx_lines))
+ uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
sc16is7xx_power(&s->p[i].port, 0);
}
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024010454-ramble-scrubbed-41fb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox