From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 2045gemini@gmail.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "usb: mon: Fix atomicity violation in mon_bin_vma_fault" added to usb-next
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 10:37:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024010508-synthesis-squash-631d@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: mon: Fix atomicity violation in mon_bin_vma_fault
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-next branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will also be merged in the next major kernel release
during the merge window.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 2dd23cc4d0e6aa55cf9fb3b05f2f4165b01de81c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:24:12 +0800
Subject: usb: mon: Fix atomicity violation in mon_bin_vma_fault
In mon_bin_vma_fault():
offset = vmf->pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
if (offset >= rp->b_size)
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
chunk_idx = offset / CHUNK_SIZE;
pageptr = rp->b_vec[chunk_idx].pg;
The code is executed without holding any lock.
In mon_bin_vma_close():
spin_lock_irqsave(&rp->b_lock, flags);
rp->mmap_active--;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rp->b_lock, flags);
In mon_bin_ioctl():
spin_lock_irqsave(&rp->b_lock, flags);
if (rp->mmap_active) {
...
} else {
...
kfree(rp->b_vec);
rp->b_vec = vec;
rp->b_size = size;
...
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rp->b_lock, flags);
Concurrent execution of mon_bin_vma_fault() with mon_bin_vma_close() and
mon_bin_ioctl() could lead to atomicity violations. mon_bin_vma_fault()
accesses rp->b_size and rp->b_vec without locking, risking array
out-of-bounds access or use-after-free bugs due to possible modifications
in mon_bin_ioctl().
This possible bug is found by an experimental static analysis tool
developed by our team, BassCheck[1]. This tool analyzes the locking APIs
to extract function pairs that can be concurrently executed, and then
analyzes the instructions in the paired functions to identify possible
concurrency bugs including data races and atomicity violations. The above
possible bug is reported when our tool analyzes the source code of
Linux 6.2.
To address this issue, it is proposed to add a spin lock pair in
mon_bin_vma_fault() to ensure atomicity. With this patch applied, our tool
never reports the possible bug, with the kernel configuration allyesconfig
for x86_64. Due to the lack of associated hardware, we cannot test the
patch in runtime testing, and just verify it according to the code logic.
[1] https://sites.google.com/view/basscheck/
Fixes: 19e6317d24c2 ("usb: mon: Fix a deadlock in usbmon between ...")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105052412.9377-1-2045gemini@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c b/drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c
index 9ca9305243fe..4e30de4db1c0 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c
@@ -1250,14 +1250,19 @@ static vm_fault_t mon_bin_vma_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
struct mon_reader_bin *rp = vmf->vma->vm_private_data;
unsigned long offset, chunk_idx;
struct page *pageptr;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rp->b_lock, flags);
offset = vmf->pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (offset >= rp->b_size)
+ if (offset >= rp->b_size) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rp->b_lock, flags);
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+ }
chunk_idx = offset / CHUNK_SIZE;
pageptr = rp->b_vec[chunk_idx].pg;
get_page(pageptr);
vmf->page = pageptr;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rp->b_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2024-01-05 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024010508-synthesis-squash-631d@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=2045gemini@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox