[PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.6.12-rc1

Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
    nfsd: drop the nfsd_put helper


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile         |  4 ++--
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 fs/nfsd/nfsd.h   |  7 -------
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

[PATCH 6.6 1/1] nfsd: drop the nfsd_put helper

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

commit 64e6304169f1e1f078e7f0798033f80a7fb0ea46 upstream.

It's not safe to call nfsd_put once nfsd_last_thread has been called, as
that function will zero out the nn->nfsd_serv pointer.

Drop the nfsd_put helper altogether and open-code the svc_put in its
callers instead. That allows us to not be reliant on the value of that
pointer when handling an error.

Fixes: 2a501f55cd64 ("nfsd: call nfsd_last_thread() before final nfsd_put()")
Reported-by: Zhi Li <yieli@redhat.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 fs/nfsd/nfsd.h   |    7 -------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
@@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static ssize_t __write_ports_addfd(char
 	char *mesg = buf;
 	int fd, err;
 	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
+	struct svc_serv *serv;
 
 	err = get_int(&mesg, &fd);
 	if (err != 0 || fd < 0)
@@ -702,15 +703,15 @@ static ssize_t __write_ports_addfd(char
 	if (err != 0)
 		return err;
 
-	err = svc_addsock(nn->nfsd_serv, net, fd, buf, SIMPLE_TRANSACTION_LIMIT, cred);
+	serv = nn->nfsd_serv;
+	err = svc_addsock(serv, net, fd, buf, SIMPLE_TRANSACTION_LIMIT, cred);
 
-	if (err < 0 && !nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !nn->keep_active)
+	if (err < 0 && !serv->sv_nrthreads && !nn->keep_active)
 		nfsd_last_thread(net);
-	else if (err >= 0 &&
-		 !nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !xchg(&nn->keep_active, 1))
-		svc_get(nn->nfsd_serv);
+	else if (err >= 0 && !serv->sv_nrthreads && !xchg(&nn->keep_active, 1))
+		svc_get(serv);
 
-	nfsd_put(net);
+	svc_put(serv);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -724,6 +725,7 @@ static ssize_t __write_ports_addxprt(cha
 	struct svc_xprt *xprt;
 	int port, err;
 	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
+	struct svc_serv *serv;
 
 	if (sscanf(buf, "%15s %5u", transport, &port) != 2)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -736,32 +738,33 @@ static ssize_t __write_ports_addxprt(cha
 	if (err != 0)
 		return err;
 
-	err = svc_xprt_create(nn->nfsd_serv, transport, net,
+	serv = nn->nfsd_serv;
+	err = svc_xprt_create(serv, transport, net,
 			      PF_INET, port, SVC_SOCK_ANONYMOUS, cred);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out_err;
 
-	err = svc_xprt_create(nn->nfsd_serv, transport, net,
+	err = svc_xprt_create(serv, transport, net,
 			      PF_INET6, port, SVC_SOCK_ANONYMOUS, cred);
 	if (err < 0 && err != -EAFNOSUPPORT)
 		goto out_close;
 
-	if (!nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !xchg(&nn->keep_active, 1))
-		svc_get(nn->nfsd_serv);
+	if (!serv->sv_nrthreads && !xchg(&nn->keep_active, 1))
+		svc_get(serv);
 
-	nfsd_put(net);
+	svc_put(serv);
 	return 0;
 out_close:
-	xprt = svc_find_xprt(nn->nfsd_serv, transport, net, PF_INET, port);
+	xprt = svc_find_xprt(serv, transport, net, PF_INET, port);
 	if (xprt != NULL) {
 		svc_xprt_close(xprt);
 		svc_xprt_put(xprt);
 	}
 out_err:
-	if (!nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !nn->keep_active)
+	if (!serv->sv_nrthreads && !nn->keep_active)
 		nfsd_last_thread(net);
 
-	nfsd_put(net);
+	svc_put(serv);
 	return err;
 }
 
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
@@ -96,13 +96,6 @@ int		nfsd_pool_stats_open(struct inode *
 int		nfsd_pool_stats_release(struct inode *, struct file *);
 void		nfsd_shutdown_threads(struct net *net);
 
-static inline void nfsd_put(struct net *net)
-{
-	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
-
-	svc_put(nn->nfsd_serv);
-}
-
 bool		i_am_nfsd(void);
 
 struct nfsdfs_client {

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Takeshi Ogasawara]

Hi Greg

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 7:02 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

6.6.12-rc1 tested.

Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)

[    0.000000] Linux version 6.6.12-rc1rv
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20230801, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.41.0) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Jan 13 21:45:47 JST 2024

Thanks

Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Luna Jernberg]

Works fine on my Dell Latitude 7390 laptop with model name    :
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8350U CPU @ 1.70GHz
and Crystal Linux: https://getcryst.al/site

Tested-by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@gmail.com>

Den lör 13 jan. 2024 kl 10:02 skrev Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>     Linux 6.6.12-rc1
>
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>     nfsd: drop the nfsd_put helper
>
>
> -------------
>
> Diffstat:
>
>  Makefile         |  4 ++--
>  fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  fs/nfsd/nfsd.h   |  7 -------
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
>
>

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[SeongJae Park]

Hello,

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:58 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] f44c56831910 ("Linux 6.6.12-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 556 bytes --]

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:50:58AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Ricardo B. Marliere]

On 13 Jan 10:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

System runs fine, no noticeable regressions.

[    0.000000] Linux version 6.6.12-rc1-ktest-gf44c56831910 (rbmarliere@debian) (gcc (Debian 13.2.0-9) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.41.50.20231227) #2 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 19:53:04 -03 2024

Tested-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>

Thanks!
-	Ricardo

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 1/13/24 1:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 15:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.6.12-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.6.y
* git commit: f44c56831910cb87cac2c18e1b03dfa59e3523ce
* git describe: v6.6.11-2-gf44c56831910
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.11-2-gf44c56831910/

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.10)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.10)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.10)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.10)

## Test result summary
total: 284816, pass: 245629, fail: 3651, skip: 35205, xfail: 331

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 145 total, 144 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 41 total, 40 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 44 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:58 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.6:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    116 tests:	116 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.6.12-rc1-gf44c56831910
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Shreeya Patel]

On Saturday, January 13, 2024 15:20 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

Please find the KernelCI report for this week :-

## stable-rc HEAD for linux-6.6.y:
Date: 2024-01-13
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=f44c56831910cb87cac2c18e1b03dfa59e3523ce

## Build failures:

No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.6.y commit head \o/

## Boot failures:

No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.6.y commit head \o/

Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>

Thanks,
Shreeya Patel

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 505 bytes --]

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:50:58AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Harshit Mogalapalli]

Hi Greg,

On 13/01/24 3:20 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Built and boot tested on x86_64 and aarch64.

Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>

Thanks,
Harshit
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 1/13/2024 1:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.6 0/1] 6.6.12-rc1 review

[Allen]

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.12 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.