From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C8A61848; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="t6JTNYwg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE8DEC433F1; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:57:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1705139830; bh=WtaJF7mnwuMK9hNr7F5tQUrsMFPEYqczTi0jJQd4bV0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=t6JTNYwgCMxGlukRZ4p18Yw6N2s8v56h3cSsGZpwhdzdOdnU+rTE/9JN40qYOSWO/ iNrBc0UPd1x5sHnqcMlfTq34La1NNnc1oxw+1bRDfrpeM30paYM5JDdPp2c/rBBl6B o/J0vC4Xu86duIDZZO4PV/ufvx1Ah6yptEk8B7b8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Eric Dumazet , syzbot , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , Suraj Jitindar Singh Subject: [PATCH 5.4 37/38] ipv6: make ip6_rt_gc_expire an atomic_t Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20240113094207.590835711@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240113094206.455533180@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240113094206.455533180@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Eric Dumazet commit 9cb7c013420f98fa6fd12fc6a5dc055170c108db upstream. Reads and Writes to ip6_rt_gc_expire always have been racy, as syzbot reported lately [1] There is a possible risk of under-flow, leading to unexpected high value passed to fib6_run_gc(), although I have not observed this in the field. Hosts hitting ip6_dst_gc() very hard are under pretty bad state anyway. [1] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ip6_dst_gc / ip6_dst_gc read-write to 0xffff888102110744 of 4 bytes by task 13165 on cpu 1: ip6_dst_gc+0x1f3/0x220 net/ipv6/route.c:3311 dst_alloc+0x9b/0x160 net/core/dst.c:86 ip6_dst_alloc net/ipv6/route.c:344 [inline] icmp6_dst_alloc+0xb2/0x360 net/ipv6/route.c:3261 mld_sendpack+0x2b9/0x580 net/ipv6/mcast.c:1807 mld_send_cr net/ipv6/mcast.c:2119 [inline] mld_ifc_work+0x576/0x800 net/ipv6/mcast.c:2651 process_one_work+0x3d3/0x720 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x618/0xa70 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x1a9/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 read-write to 0xffff888102110744 of 4 bytes by task 11607 on cpu 0: ip6_dst_gc+0x1f3/0x220 net/ipv6/route.c:3311 dst_alloc+0x9b/0x160 net/core/dst.c:86 ip6_dst_alloc net/ipv6/route.c:344 [inline] icmp6_dst_alloc+0xb2/0x360 net/ipv6/route.c:3261 mld_sendpack+0x2b9/0x580 net/ipv6/mcast.c:1807 mld_send_cr net/ipv6/mcast.c:2119 [inline] mld_ifc_work+0x576/0x800 net/ipv6/mcast.c:2651 process_one_work+0x3d3/0x720 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x618/0xa70 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x1a9/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 value changed: 0x00000bb3 -> 0x00000ba9 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 0 PID: 11607 Comm: kworker/0:21 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-syzkaller-00037-g42e7a03d3bad-dirty #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: mld mld_ifc_work Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Reported-by: syzbot Reviewed-by: David Ahern Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220413181333.649424-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski [ 5.4: context adjustment in include/net/netns/ipv6.h ] Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Cc: # 5.4.x Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/net/netns/ipv6.h | 4 ++-- net/ipv6/route.c | 11 ++++++----- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/include/net/netns/ipv6.h +++ b/include/net/netns/ipv6.h @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ struct netns_ipv6 { struct dst_ops ip6_dst_ops; rwlock_t fib6_walker_lock; spinlock_t fib6_gc_lock; - unsigned int ip6_rt_gc_expire; - unsigned long ip6_rt_last_gc; + atomic_t ip6_rt_gc_expire; + unsigned long ip6_rt_last_gc; #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES unsigned int fib6_rules_require_fldissect; bool fib6_has_custom_rules; --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -3215,6 +3215,7 @@ static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *op int rt_elasticity = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_elasticity; int rt_gc_timeout = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_timeout; unsigned long rt_last_gc = net->ipv6.ip6_rt_last_gc; + unsigned int val; int entries; entries = dst_entries_get_fast(ops); @@ -3225,13 +3226,13 @@ static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *op entries <= rt_max_size) goto out; - net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire++; - fib6_run_gc(net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire, net, true); + fib6_run_gc(atomic_inc_return(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire), net, true); entries = dst_entries_get_slow(ops); if (entries < ops->gc_thresh) - net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire = rt_gc_timeout>>1; + atomic_set(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire, rt_gc_timeout >> 1); out: - net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire -= net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire>>rt_elasticity; + val = atomic_read(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire); + atomic_set(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire, val - (val >> rt_elasticity)); return entries > rt_max_size; } @@ -6329,7 +6330,7 @@ static int __net_init ip6_route_net_init net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_min_advmss = IPV6_MIN_MTU - 20 - 40; net->ipv6.sysctl.skip_notify_on_dev_down = 0; - net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire = 30*HZ; + atomic_set(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire, 30*HZ); ret = 0; out: