From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27E316410; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 20:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="yNNEC5ip" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9614C433C7; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 20:43:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1705178632; bh=lssXLb+zTu/GEgbL+MkdwmlDfzEyJ5HHfjf8dm6VAEg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yNNEC5ipCwhgu2a4URTG+TiCULdcvhKoekvsqFWMWdVujNSY+58QUB6BfwTyCsQoy x1wATKLgc779YY+u7Yrx/wTEXyu7yMsZ0UkON8zc/Q9YHWHz2VVc18gWg998yRNd33 3AciHxDvJ8aKZKX4oQ9T62611CI6G3nWi4RrbUWQ= Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 21:43:48 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn-Thorben?= Hinz Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Willem de Bruijn , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 09/43] net: Implement missing getsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW) Message-ID: <2024011329-caloric-survival-1efd@gregkh> References: <20240113094206.930684111@linuxfoundation.org> <20240113094207.231546964@linuxfoundation.org> <27f5543f5c6023ce0d9bc6161aef9e37cc720a02.camel@mailbox.tu-berlin.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <27f5543f5c6023ce0d9bc6161aef9e37cc720a02.camel@mailbox.tu-berlin.de> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 08:25:54PM +0100, Jörn-Thorben Hinz wrote: > Hi Greg, > > this patch is applied in the wrong place (the wrong case) here in > sock_getsockopt(). The function seems to have changed in a number of > places after 5.10, apparently too much for an automatic(?!) merge. Good catch, I've dropped it from the 5.4 and 5.10 trees now, thanks for the review! greg k-h