From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y] selftests/bpf: Remove flaky test_btf_id test
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:31:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024020204-enchilada-come-ded2@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202034545.3143734-1-samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:45:45PM -0800, Samasth Norway Ananda wrote:
> From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>
> [ Upstream commit 56925f389e152dcb8d093435d43b78a310539c23 ]
>
> With previous patch, one of subtests in test_btf_id becomes
> flaky and may fail. The following is a failing example:
>
> Error: #26 btf
> Error: #26/174 btf/BTF ID
> Error: #26/174 btf/BTF ID
> btf_raw_create:PASS:check 0 nsec
> btf_raw_create:PASS:check 0 nsec
> test_btf_id:PASS:check 0 nsec
> ...
> test_btf_id:PASS:check 0 nsec
> test_btf_id:FAIL:check BTF lingersdo_test_get_info:FAIL:check failed: -1
>
> The test tries to prove a btf_id not available after the map is closed.
> But btf_id is freed only after workqueue and a rcu grace period, compared
> to previous case just after a rcu grade period.
> Depending on system workload, workqueue could take quite some time
> to execute function bpf_map_free_deferred() which may cause the test failure.
> Instead of adding arbitrary delays, let us remove the logic to
> check btf_id availability after map is closed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214203820.1469402-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> [Samasth: backport for 6.6.y]
> Signed-off-by: Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com>
> ---
> Above patch is a fix for 59e5791f59dd ("bpf: Fix a race condition between
> btf_put() and map_free()"). While the commit causing the error is
> present in 6.6.y the fix is not present.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
What about 6.7 as well? Shouldn't this change be there too?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-03 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 3:45 [PATCH 6.6.y] selftests/bpf: Remove flaky test_btf_id test Samasth Norway Ananda
2024-02-03 1:31 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-02-03 1:33 ` [External] : " samasth.norway.ananda
2024-02-03 3:37 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024020204-enchilada-come-ded2@gregkh \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=samasth.norway.ananda@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox