+ nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The patch titled
     Subject: nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Subject: nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 01:16:45 +0900

According to a syzbot report, end_buffer_async_write(), which handles the
completion of block device writes, may detect abnormal condition of the
buffer async_write flag and cause a BUG_ON failure when using nilfs2.

Nilfs2 itself does not use end_buffer_async_write().  But, the async_write
flag is now used as a marker by commit 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue
with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") as
a means of resolving double list insertion of dirty blocks in
nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and nilfs_lookup_node_buffers() and the
resulting crash.

This modification is safe as long as it is used for file data and b-tree
node blocks where the page caches are independent.  However, it was
irrelevant and redundant to also introduce async_write for segment summary
and super root blocks that share buffers with the backing device.  This
led to the possibility that the BUG_ON check in end_buffer_async_write
would fail as described above, if independent writebacks of the backing
device occurred in parallel.

The use of async_write for segment summary buffers has already been
removed in a previous change.

Fix this issue by removing the manipulation of the async_write flag for
the remaining super root block buffer.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240203161645.4992-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+5c04210f7c7f897c1e7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000019a97c05fd42f8c8@google.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/nilfs2/segment.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c~nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -1703,7 +1703,6 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 
 		list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers,
 				    b_assoc_buffers) {
-			set_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
 				if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) {
 					folio_lock(bd_folio);
@@ -1714,6 +1713,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 				}
 				break;
 			}
+			set_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh->b_folio != fs_folio) {
 				nilfs_begin_folio_io(fs_folio);
 				fs_folio = bh->b_folio;
@@ -1800,7 +1800,6 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list
 
 		list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers,
 				    b_assoc_buffers) {
-			clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
 				clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 				if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) {
@@ -1809,6 +1808,7 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list
 				}
 				break;
 			}
+			clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh->b_folio != fs_folio) {
 				nilfs_end_folio_io(fs_folio, err);
 				fs_folio = bh->b_folio;
@@ -1896,8 +1896,9 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write
 				 BIT(BH_Delay) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Volatile) |
 				 BIT(BH_NILFS_Redirected));
 
-			set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits);
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
+				set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+				clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
 				if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) {
 					folio_end_writeback(bd_folio);
 					bd_folio = bh->b_folio;
@@ -1905,6 +1906,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write
 				update_sr = true;
 				break;
 			}
+			set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits);
 			if (bh->b_folio != fs_folio) {
 				nilfs_end_folio_io(fs_folio, 0);
 				fs_folio = bh->b_folio;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com are

nilfs2-fix-data-corruption-in-dsync-block-recovery-for-small-block-sizes.patch
nilfs2-fix-hang-in-nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers.patch
nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write.patch
nilfs2-convert-segment-buffer-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-convert-nilfs_copy_buffer-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-convert-metadata-file-common-code-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-convert-sufile-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-convert-persistent-object-allocator-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-convert-dat-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-move-nilfs_bmap_write-call-out-of-nilfs_write_inode_common.patch
nilfs2-do-not-acquire-rwsem-in-nilfs_bmap_write.patch
nilfs2-convert-ifile-to-use-kmap_local.patch
nilfs2-localize-highmem-mapping-for-checkpoint-creation-within-cpfile.patch
nilfs2-localize-highmem-mapping-for-checkpoint-finalization-within-cpfile.patch
nilfs2-localize-highmem-mapping-for-checkpoint-reading-within-cpfile.patch
nilfs2-remove-nilfs_cpfile_getput_checkpoint.patch
nilfs2-convert-cpfile-to-use-kmap_local.patch