From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E6957866 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707833926; cv=none; b=WZglU+RwEI8oap6h2PFsqywCsInh8WU7hvJCfHZT2I1Vl+3EX0WRL7lC1BVS6+CqTnmpo2U0HxhTqarBMZNRogmT2/Gyk5qsmT9S/+5gcIJGtEm2dlbFPYUv33RO+OdtJPn7egIIYJ2Mln9RovVS7NpGZoi4WLwh8oTKwwNYbFc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707833926; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jf3wVUdQqMFf5WMp1toa6ZOp8OLgH6bQTxHge/35lRo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hBNZMLSDUX/awAlHwlUyXAaR12It/GSVJljH9ZkI0eYlosoRjlwpUy9KTclW7uO7hUqbHAdaAz/2hiFlkrMUlI/usi/3v/MKwUHogB9ZD1RcTvZeDuF0IuU5lG4sYGD2RWSOc4BZP0rpcEI95Rna77FHjJXX9/PQUy49G3LiRo0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=RHB7c8cY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="RHB7c8cY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D27E8C433F1; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:18:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1707833926; bh=jf3wVUdQqMFf5WMp1toa6ZOp8OLgH6bQTxHge/35lRo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RHB7c8cYfxwHXXf6hacpY7r5LH6h1a42p13MebwDiSjDZAQi7qFLt9Lf24pR9Ta0n 3VtTVkZ5D3eqFZTHWnGXA2Ttq59NXdQrhNXGrRjzbCIKS1BwFIFBPAN30SlV80/1r0 psyADuAxHR8L/5IS+esbgeceNC1oJnWz5qukDaF0= Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:18:43 +0100 From: Greg KH To: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Pecio Cc: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xhci: handle isoc Babble and Buffer Overrun events properly" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree Message-ID: <2024021322-snitch-pauper-fd9c@gregkh> References: <2024021308-hardness-undercook-6840@gregkh> <20240213143921.25a6f291@foxbook> <2024021351-overstay-crisply-f6af@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2024021351-overstay-crisply-f6af@gregkh> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:17:36PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:39:21PM +0100, Michał Pecio wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > > [...] > > > From 7c4650ded49e5b88929ecbbb631efb8b0838e811 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Michal Pecio > > > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:27:37 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] xhci: handle isoc Babble and Buffer Overrun events > > > > This patch depends on its parent 5372c65e1311 ("xhci: process isoc TD > > properly when there was a transaction error mid TD."). > > > > The parent commit appears to be missing from your 5.10 and earlier > > queues for some reason, hence the breakage. > > That parent commit would not apply to those older kernels (and I had no > hint that it should go there.) I've backported it to 5.10.y ok, but 5.4 > and 4.19 were harder. So if you want both of these in those older > kernels, please provide working backports and I'll be glad to queue them > up. Nope, my 5.10.y backport failed too, so will need working versions for that tree as well. thanks, greg k-h