From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2493737704 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708359432; cv=none; b=rdxTkIbOubiXEShwGszp90YJTBbWm5enc/n7LGrXvuvqnyRH5PFLj3QidWIQphiLzhShjjv4totfjoeqcgdfPyTacrNJafS/6Th42vPVCOxzTjxQMndXhxr/504mfYjitE+y9NgEGHALCx00qUqIeOrw0BEFu2r+eDHkrGIpgtI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708359432; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zUWOt+OPWTY2eIUSI3xWKIU5X0EtvP+ZaMD3OQRLFw4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kR2EJ7lk6rS+qlrpmGcX4WIBcVxnooA5w1Yu4iGxtRM0f9xKjkx/7gD6r2BE+oVh7gu7lhclZaRvNBvASbEReqASEtP0BIAtqM5gEbVw9jJ3sMS8C0YT6YTRVv1qaEDSXi89OuQPN9pDKgTQO+65jwTEEDj+H0dFjGgOPv/3jw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=IAX25bUz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="IAX25bUz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E8F0C433F1; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:17:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1708359431; bh=zUWOt+OPWTY2eIUSI3xWKIU5X0EtvP+ZaMD3OQRLFw4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=IAX25bUzgM8xWYpDz7prwBSgwzPmFEr94ra1Ew1kdMhbisj4OozHGAF9sGvCItM7q omNxg4KLYGoQ3MFkoYpjc6fLUH3KDZpSLI8eWeAZD7JGJYOL6OnTuzqAb+yWehVm97 jJBaocS+TjF7qctG0CL9lLaNthzNv3VZUWMlKnQc= Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree To: libaokun1@huawei.com,jack@suse.cz,stable@vger.kernel.org,tytso@mit.edu Cc: From: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 17:17:08 +0100 Message-ID: <2024021908-deferred-oppose-2c8f@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 2331fd4a49864e1571b4f50aa3aa1536ed6220d0 # git commit -s git send-email --to '' --in-reply-to '2024021908-deferred-oppose-2c8f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 2331fd4a4986 ("ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks()") c9b528c35795 ("ext4: regenerate buddy after block freeing failed if under fc replay") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 2331fd4a49864e1571b4f50aa3aa1536ed6220d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baokun Li Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:20:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks() After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and bb_fragments. Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment length. Hence move the update of bb_free to after the block double-free check guarantees that the corresponding statistics are updated only after the core block bitmap is modified. Fixes: eabe0444df90 ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit") CC: # 3.10 Suggested-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-5-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index c97ad0e77831..fa351aa323dc 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -1909,11 +1909,6 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, mb_check_buddy(e4b); mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count); - this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq); - e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count; - if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free) - e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first; - /* access memory sequentially: check left neighbour, * clear range and then check right neighbour */ @@ -1927,23 +1922,31 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); ext4_fsblk_t blocknr; + /* + * Fastcommit replay can free already freed blocks which + * corrupts allocation info. Regenerate it. + */ + if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) { + mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b); + goto check; + } + blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group); blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block); - if (!(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY)) { - ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, - inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, - blocknr, - "freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.", - block); - ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted( - sb, e4b->bd_group, + ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, + inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, blocknr, + "freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.", + block); + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group, EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT); - } else { - mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b); - } - goto done; + return; } + this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq); + e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count; + if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free) + e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first; + /* let's maintain fragments counter */ if (left_is_free && right_is_free) e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--; @@ -1968,9 +1971,9 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, if (first <= last) mb_buddy_mark_free(e4b, first >> 1, last >> 1); -done: mb_set_largest_free_order(sb, e4b->bd_info); mb_update_avg_fragment_size(sb, e4b->bd_info); +check: mb_check_buddy(e4b); }