Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: brauner@kernel.org,jack@suse.cz,kzak@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs: relax mount_setattr() permission checks" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:47:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024021922-repugnant-crafter-ce03@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 46f5ab762d048dad224436978315cbc2fa79c630
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024021922-repugnant-crafter-ce03@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

46f5ab762d04 ("fs: relax mount_setattr() permission checks")
87bb5b60019c ("fs: clean up mount_setattr control flow")
a26f788b6e7a ("fs: add mnt_allow_writers() and simplify mount_setattr_prepare()")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 46f5ab762d048dad224436978315cbc2fa79c630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:22:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fs: relax mount_setattr() permission checks

When we added mount_setattr() I added additional checks compared to the
legacy do_reconfigure_mnt() and do_change_type() helpers used by regular
mount(2). If that mount had a parent then verify that the caller and the
mount namespace the mount is attached to match and if not make sure that
it's an anonymous mount.

The real rootfs falls into neither category. It is neither an anoymous
mount because it is obviously attached to the initial mount namespace
but it also obviously doesn't have a parent mount. So that means legacy
mount(2) allows changing mount properties on the real rootfs but
mount_setattr(2) blocks this. I never thought much about this but of
course someone on this planet of earth changes properties on the real
rootfs as can be seen in [1].

Since util-linux finally switched to the new mount api in 2.39 not so
long ago it also relies on mount_setattr() and that surfaced this issue
when Fedora 39 finally switched to it. Fix this.

Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256843
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206-vfs-mount-rootfs-v1-1-19b335eee133@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.12+
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 437f60e96d40..5a51315c6678 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -4472,10 +4472,15 @@ static int do_mount_setattr(struct path *path, struct mount_kattr *kattr)
 	/*
 	 * If this is an attached mount make sure it's located in the callers
 	 * mount namespace. If it's not don't let the caller interact with it.
-	 * If this is a detached mount make sure it has an anonymous mount
-	 * namespace attached to it, i.e. we've created it via OPEN_TREE_CLONE.
+	 *
+	 * If this mount doesn't have a parent it's most often simply a
+	 * detached mount with an anonymous mount namespace. IOW, something
+	 * that's simply not attached yet. But there are apparently also users
+	 * that do change mount properties on the rootfs itself. That obviously
+	 * neither has a parent nor is it a detached mount so we cannot
+	 * unconditionally check for detached mounts.
 	 */
-	if (!(mnt_has_parent(mnt) ? check_mnt(mnt) : is_anon_ns(mnt->mnt_ns)))
+	if ((mnt_has_parent(mnt) || !is_anon_ns(mnt->mnt_ns)) && !check_mnt(mnt))
 		goto out;
 
 	/*


                 reply	other threads:[~2024-02-19 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024021922-repugnant-crafter-ce03@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox