From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6 6.7] nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 06:29:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240220212928.5611-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> (raw)
commit 5bc09b397cbf1221f8a8aacb1152650c9195b02b upstream.
According to a syzbot report, end_buffer_async_write(), which handles the
completion of block device writes, may detect abnormal condition of the
buffer async_write flag and cause a BUG_ON failure when using nilfs2.
Nilfs2 itself does not use end_buffer_async_write(). But, the async_write
flag is now used as a marker by commit 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue
with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") as
a means of resolving double list insertion of dirty blocks in
nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and nilfs_lookup_node_buffers() and the
resulting crash.
This modification is safe as long as it is used for file data and b-tree
node blocks where the page caches are independent. However, it was
irrelevant and redundant to also introduce async_write for segment summary
and super root blocks that share buffers with the backing device. This
led to the possibility that the BUG_ON check in end_buffer_async_write
would fail as described above, if independent writebacks of the backing
device occurred in parallel.
The use of async_write for segment summary buffers has already been
removed in a previous change.
Fix this issue by removing the manipulation of the async_write flag for
the remaining super root block buffer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240203161645.4992-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+5c04210f7c7f897c1e7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000019a97c05fd42f8c8@google.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
Please queue this patch to these stable trees instead of the patch
that failed to apply to them.
This patch is tailored to account for page/folio conversion and can
be applied from v4.8 to v6.7.
Also, all the builds and tests I did on each stable tree passed.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
index 55e31cc903d1..0f21dbcd0bfb 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -1703,7 +1703,6 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers,
b_assoc_buffers) {
- set_buffer_async_write(bh);
if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
if (bh->b_page != bd_page) {
lock_page(bd_page);
@@ -1714,6 +1713,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
}
break;
}
+ set_buffer_async_write(bh);
if (bh->b_page != fs_page) {
nilfs_begin_page_io(fs_page);
fs_page = bh->b_page;
@@ -1799,7 +1799,6 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list_head *logs, int err)
list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers,
b_assoc_buffers) {
- clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
if (bh->b_page != bd_page) {
@@ -1808,6 +1807,7 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list_head *logs, int err)
}
break;
}
+ clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
if (bh->b_page != fs_page) {
nilfs_end_page_io(fs_page, err);
fs_page = bh->b_page;
@@ -1895,8 +1895,9 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
BIT(BH_Delay) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Volatile) |
BIT(BH_NILFS_Redirected));
- set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits);
if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+ clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
if (bh->b_page != bd_page) {
end_page_writeback(bd_page);
bd_page = bh->b_page;
@@ -1904,6 +1905,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
update_sr = true;
break;
}
+ set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits);
if (bh->b_page != fs_page) {
nilfs_end_page_io(fs_page, 0);
fs_page = bh->b_page;
--
2.39.3
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 21:29 Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
2024-02-21 8:48 ` [PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6 6.7] nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240220212928.5611-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--to=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox