From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out28-68.mail.aliyun.com (out28-68.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.28.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3504C12F5B5 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.28.68 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708608795; cv=none; b=ki0KHH0/97DU11y/pg8qOVhKWgw4T+44Rt6Dzf/7EXZC7keh53BUXK7XKe6JiHMKCHOe9PBAuC02cdSpBk5DFcqt0BJfo9hJcqh+qGIEIyAr7bsHy17Fs/plUv0yp2u4Fl9dvydzRZ4wr9ULFLkhhfAjiJTaGpMRoc1RNR2iMxk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708608795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7dY0J6tWUfZDjRXqq+3RTmoIss7uMaGRscXZvaR85HE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Message-Id: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=n3CvJusPGyVJeU1ErB3NtqvETKU6x5wv0LGrmc5tkVgWuJGdvgsJ3P02BBYak7UUigJNzBPXTzRGodiGC8JZZ6i0lGd0ybyQ+JBK1FXIP5G5FwvzumZKDOvHn8O3dnKk/6N9E3SuFecrhT30E7CTDtKvSIF8ESeqClbSoBRc6bA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=e16-tech.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=e16-tech.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.28.68 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=e16-tech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=e16-tech.com X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=CONTINUE;BC=0.09046134|-1;CH=green;DM=|CONTINUE|false|;DS=CONTINUE|ham_enroll_verification|0.082199-0.00234652-0.915454;FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018047202;MF=wangyugui@e16-tech.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=5;RT=5;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.WX5xhwP_1708606924; Received: from 192.168.2.112(mailfrom:wangyugui@e16-tech.com fp:SMTPD_---.WX5xhwP_1708606924) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:02:05 +0800 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:02:05 +0800 From: Wang Yugui To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 111/476] NFSD: Modernize nfsd4_release_lockowner() Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Chuck Lever , Sasha Levin In-Reply-To: <2024022213-salami-earflap-aec9@gregkh> References: <20240222061911.6F1A.409509F4@e16-tech.com> <2024022213-salami-earflap-aec9@gregkh> Message-Id: <20240222210204.4F83.409509F4@e16-tech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.81.05 [en] Hi, > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 06:19:12AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Chuck Lever > > > > > > [ Upstream commit bd8fdb6e545f950f4654a9a10d7e819ad48146e5 ] > > > > > > Refactor: Use existing helpers that other lock operations use. This > > > change removes several automatic variables, so re-organize the > > > variable declarations for readability. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever > > > Stable-dep-of: edcf9725150e ("nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER") > > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > > > > > > "nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER" is yet not in 5.15.149-rc1? > > or I missed something? > > Good catch, you are correct! I'll go drop this, and the other nfsd > "dep-of" commit in this queue, and in the 5.10 and 5.4 queues. Will we add "nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER" to 5.15.y later? It seems that at least 5.15.y need "nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER". Best Regards Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com) 2024/02/22