Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched/rt fixes for 4.19

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:13:21PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> 
> > > maybe you will not like introducing 'static int int_max = INT_MAX;' for
> > > this old kernel which EOL in 10 months.
> 
> > That's fine, not a big deal :)
> 
> Thanks for a quick info. I guess this is a reply to my question about
> SYSCTL_NEG_ONE failure on missing SYSCTL_NEG_ONE. Therefore I'll create
> static int __maybe_unused neg_one = -1; (which was used before 78e36f3b0dae).

Great.

> > > Cyril Hrubis (3):
> > >   sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value
> > >   sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset
> > >   sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us
> 
> > >  kernel/sched/rt.c | 10 +++++-----
> > >  kernel/sysctl.c   |  5 +++++
> > >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> > Thanks for the patches, but they all got connected into the same thread,
> > making it impossible to detect which ones are for what branches :(
> 
> > Can you put the version in the [PATCH X/Y] section like [PATCH 4.14 X/Y]
> > or just make separate threads so we have a chance?
> 
> I'm sorry, I'll resent all patches properly.

No worries, the second round looks good.  I'll queue them up after this
latest set of stable kernels goes out in a few days.

thanks!

greg k-h