From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8769D13541B; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708959342; cv=none; b=povF3CNl8RwRa2jSzGXyL326Adzt1bJNVgXi2b65W7mMkHk4XfrQEnihj8wx0rs0l49kVU+gGFeTNsPisTgbjmWV/Bj2mOw5YEdtzmVReKh+m0gNqxNHHwbBiS085Pix4kV1E87/Kpjz2fFCGmv2kiEK75M/FpduJU78j5qrZzQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708959342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iGTDi7slp7j7H6r1AYo4p8VNJhFt72RGq9C8BuRPFoc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CS0y9+JEAMU/ESAxv52VsMgw0BXBbZhuSP8M/eBNPNynTsp0BvGYm5l3rwR5PRdNK88GYSCbuJmY1I7Nmd19daxfWvutcWiE/NClY6R5jvj9vunWMVKguweLgjiDFG793k4zdnPu+KyYioEQ71UzD709AKKPmNu+XprjFXe/JFQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=DL8LuuQ8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="DL8LuuQ8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39B53C433C7; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:55:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1708959341; bh=iGTDi7slp7j7H6r1AYo4p8VNJhFt72RGq9C8BuRPFoc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DL8LuuQ81g6FwhDpVHbvl2aP5FkUNumBg24frdN5W7qC7yeZ1NnXKMAgenC0jSlwO bzY8prg36w3nYk1rAC5fen1vSwqgLmpoWbznMDaboBLfrD3B6cMT750FANmiurEIP9 prh2iBvq2itFvTwF9+LbY3Mobeomu7jDfqdoCjWY= Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:55:39 +0100 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" To: "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" Cc: Linux regressions mailing list , SeongJae Park , "pc@manguebit.com" , "leonardo@schenkel.net" , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" , "m.weissbach@info-gate.de" , "sairon@sairon.cz" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 6.1.70] system calls with CIFS mounts failing with "Resource temporarily unavailable" Message-ID: <2024022604-encrypt-dullness-8127@gregkh> References: <20240126191351.56183-1-sj@kernel.org> <2ab43584-8b6f-4c39-ae49-401530570c7a@leemhuis.info> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem wrote: > On 23/02/2024 06:14, Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis) > wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > > Thx. Took a while (among others because the stable team worked a bit > > slower that usual), but from what Paulo Alcantara and Salvatore > > Bonaccorso recently said everything is afaics now fixed or on track to > > be fixed in all affected stable/longterm branches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZdgyEfNsev8WGIl5@eldamar.lan/ > > > > If I got this wrong and that's not the case, please holler. > > > > #regzbot resolve: apparently fixed in all affected stable/longterm > > branches with various commits > > #regzbot ignore-activity > > > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > -- > > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: > > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr > > That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you. > > > > > > We are seeing CIFS mount failures after upgrading from v5.15.148 to > v5.15.149, I have reverted eb3e28c1e8 ("smb3: Replace smb2pdu 1-element > arrays with flex-arrays") and I no longer see the regression. It looks like > the issue is also impacting v5.10.y as the mentioned reverted patch has also > been merged to v5.10.210. I am currently running the CIFS mount test > manually and will update the thread with the exact mount failure error. I > think we should revert eb3e28c1e8 ("smb3: Replace smb2pdu 1-element arrays > with flex-arrays") from both v5.15.y & v5.10.y until we come up with a > proper fix on this versions, please note that if we will take this path then > we will need to re-introduce. b3632baa5045 ("cifs: fix off-by-one in > SMB2_query_info_init()") which has been removed from latest v5.10.y and > v5.15.y releases. > > Please send this as a patch series, in a new thread, so we can properly track this, we have too many different threads here (and the subject line is wrong...) thanks, greg k-h