From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA29B14534C for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709047641; cv=none; b=hmwHmCbMubknfd7c/bmtWX5s+jRjGXj6YXzjhErk7pHqyC+B7RYq510rCtnRt7KDE3ci8uJXfF+ToZNAZiRpW/Ux7adW8Mlt2gVyjVKUl7n5kpsT1kmqOQxyDiESsEkDcjes6HicG2PFJlMZXrgFDyzVoVrJzt7FbaoGonyxK30= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709047641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VJCXViu5/0CNocM84jxAZezeeGnFYHZuhR40OnGBgTE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KCNTZka9RUX9+wvUQNTyY/tUx+pg5OBsL8IkKJtOzgnCXYSXUt2d2/FCY3jj99zEGNvBkECOpqdLz/iodEQ3wsbcuQckv4+1Pw5A32fdXJgiRqGnthj2B5EQd8zYf8sO0ctRzQlKdUiujYyk4JSVqSZNeIMAJBr1uSUF20AUQK0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=oI5qvU/B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="oI5qvU/B" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B31BFC433F1; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:27:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1709047641; bh=VJCXViu5/0CNocM84jxAZezeeGnFYHZuhR40OnGBgTE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oI5qvU/Bdv+5c4ktOH+dWCFFpHxsai1yFBdGzER9YIktdd3GU+BIgSf2CaMkOBdpn x/3iJQ++51uPMkJophMXJNpvQ9pNmqL1jF5MHkxX9nTHvP6Wsu+rjK5XCQs1tQZnWb ywSNeGTsguL7rfe6KwKhnN4kNg6cKGgRCwwDpjxA= Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:27:18 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, martineau@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: fix more tx path fields initialization" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Message-ID: <2024022704-reflector-conducive-6b5c@gregkh> References: <2024021911-fragment-yearly-5b45@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:47:01PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 19/02/2024 17:05, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. > > (...) > > > From 3f83d8a77eeeb47011b990fd766a421ee64f1d73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Paolo Abeni > > Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:03:51 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: fix more tx path fields initialization > > > > The 'msk->write_seq' and 'msk->snd_nxt' are always updated under > > the msk socket lock, except at MPC handshake completiont time. > > > > Builds-up on the previous commit to move such init under the relevant > > lock. > > > > There are no known problems caused by the potential race, the > > primary goal is consistency. > > FYI, because of the various conflicts, and because "there are no known > problems caused by the potential race", with Paolo, we think it is best > not to backport this patch to v6.1 and older. Thanks for the review of all of these and letting us know, greg k-h