From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
borisp@nvidia.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 10/21] net: tls: factor out tls_*crypt_async_wait()
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:49:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229154946.2850012-10-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229154946.2850012-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c57ca512f3b68ddcd62bda9cc24a8f5584ab01b1 ]
Factor out waiting for async encrypt and decrypt to finish.
There are already multiple copies and a subsequent fix will
need more. No functional changes.
Note that crypto_wait_req() returns wait->err
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index dba523cdc73da..8ded200166745 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -230,6 +230,20 @@ static void tls_decrypt_done(void *data, int err)
spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
}
+static int tls_decrypt_async_wait(struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx)
+{
+ int pending;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
+ reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
+ pending = atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
+ if (pending)
+ crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
+
+ return ctx->async_wait.err;
+}
+
static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
struct scatterlist *sgin,
struct scatterlist *sgout,
@@ -495,6 +509,28 @@ static void tls_encrypt_done(void *data, int err)
schedule_delayed_work(&ctx->tx_work.work, 1);
}
+static int tls_encrypt_async_wait(struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx)
+{
+ int pending;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
+ ctx->async_notify = true;
+
+ pending = atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
+ if (pending)
+ crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
+ else
+ reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
+
+ /* There can be no concurrent accesses, since we have no
+ * pending encrypt operations
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(ctx->async_notify, false);
+
+ return ctx->async_wait.err;
+}
+
static int tls_do_encryption(struct sock *sk,
struct tls_context *tls_ctx,
struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx,
@@ -984,7 +1020,6 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
int num_zc = 0;
int orig_size;
int ret = 0;
- int pending;
if (!eor && (msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1163,24 +1198,12 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
if (!num_async) {
goto send_end;
} else if (num_zc) {
- /* Wait for pending encryptions to get completed */
- spin_lock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
- ctx->async_notify = true;
-
- pending = atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
- if (pending)
- crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
- else
- reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
-
- /* There can be no concurrent accesses, since we have no
- * pending encrypt operations
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(ctx->async_notify, false);
+ int err;
- if (ctx->async_wait.err) {
- ret = ctx->async_wait.err;
+ /* Wait for pending encryptions to get completed */
+ err = tls_encrypt_async_wait(ctx);
+ if (err) {
+ ret = err;
copied = 0;
}
}
@@ -1229,7 +1252,6 @@ void tls_sw_splice_eof(struct socket *sock)
ssize_t copied = 0;
bool retrying = false;
int ret = 0;
- int pending;
if (!ctx->open_rec)
return;
@@ -1264,22 +1286,7 @@ void tls_sw_splice_eof(struct socket *sock)
}
/* Wait for pending encryptions to get completed */
- spin_lock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
- ctx->async_notify = true;
-
- pending = atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
- if (pending)
- crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
- else
- reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
-
- /* There can be no concurrent accesses, since we have no pending
- * encrypt operations
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(ctx->async_notify, false);
-
- if (ctx->async_wait.err)
+ if (tls_encrypt_async_wait(ctx))
goto unlock;
/* Transmit if any encryptions have completed */
@@ -2109,16 +2116,10 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
recv_end:
if (async) {
- int ret, pending;
+ int ret;
/* Wait for all previously submitted records to be decrypted */
- spin_lock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
- reinit_completion(&ctx->async_wait.completion);
- pending = atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->decrypt_compl_lock);
- ret = 0;
- if (pending)
- ret = crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
+ ret = tls_decrypt_async_wait(ctx);
__skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold);
if (ret) {
@@ -2435,16 +2436,9 @@ void tls_sw_release_resources_tx(struct sock *sk)
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
struct tls_rec *rec, *tmp;
- int pending;
/* Wait for any pending async encryptions to complete */
- spin_lock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
- ctx->async_notify = true;
- pending = atomic_read(&ctx->encrypt_pending);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->encrypt_compl_lock);
-
- if (pending)
- crypto_wait_req(-EINPROGRESS, &ctx->async_wait);
+ tls_encrypt_async_wait(ctx);
tls_tx_records(sk, -1);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 15:49 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 01/21] media: Revert "media: rkisp1: Drop IRQF_SHARED" Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 02/21] media: rkisp1: Fix IRQ handling due to shared interrupts Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 03/21] Revert "drm/msm/gpu: Push gpu lock down past runpm" Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 04/21] ASoC: cs42l43: Handle error from devm_pm_runtime_enable Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 05/21] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: use correct address 3 in A-MSDU Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 06/21] arm64: jump_label: use constraints "Si" instead of "i" Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:58 ` Mark Rutland
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 07/21] perf/arm-cmn: Workaround AmpereOneX errata AC04_MESH_1 (incorrect child count) Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 08/21] btrfs: add and use helper to check if block group is used Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 09/21] selftests: openvswitch: Add validation for the recursion test Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 11/21] selftests: tls: use exact comparison in recv_partial Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 12/21] ASoC: rt5645: Make LattePanda board DMI match more precise Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 13/21] spi: intel-pci: Add support for Lunar Lake-M SPI serial flash Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 14/21] regmap: kunit: Ensure that changed bytes are actually different Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 15/21] ASoC: amd: yc: Fix non-functional mic on Lenovo 82UU Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 16/21] x86/xen: Add some null pointer checking to smp.c Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 17/21] MIPS: Clear Cause.BD in instruction_pointer_set Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 18/21] HID: multitouch: Add required quirk for Synaptics 0xcddc device Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 19/21] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-pcm: Workaround for crashed firmware on system suspend Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 20/21] gen_compile_commands: fix invalid escape sequence warning Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 15:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 21/21] arm64/sve: Lower the maximum allocation for the SVE ptrace regset Sasha Levin
2024-02-29 16:51 ` Doug Anderson
2024-02-29 17:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-29 17:25 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240229154946.2850012-10-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox