public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nikhil V <quic_nprakash@quicinc.com>
Cc: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND STABLE v6.1] iommu: Avoid races around default domain allocations
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:25:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024030403-self-morality-062e@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbf1295589bd90083ad6f75a7fbced01f327c047.1708680521.git.quic_nprakash@quicinc.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:40:50PM +0530, Nikhil V wrote:
> From: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
> 
> This fix is applicable for LTS kernel, 6.1.y. In latest kernels, this race
> issue is fixed by the patch series [1] and [2]. The right thing to do here
> would have been propagating these changes from latest kernel to the stable
> branch, 6.1.y. However, these changes seems too intrusive to be picked for
> stable branches. Hence, the fix proposed can be taken as an alternative
> instead of backporting the patch series.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v8-81230027b2fa+9d-iommu_all_defdom_jgg@nvidia.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-1b99ae392328+44574-iommu_err_unwind_jgg@nvidia.com/
> 
> Issue:
> A race condition is observed when arm_smmu_device_probe and
> modprobe of client devices happens in parallel. This results
> in the allocation of a new default domain for the iommu group
> even though it was previously allocated and the respective iova
> domain(iovad) was initialized. However, for this newly allocated
> default domain, iovad will not be initialized. As a result, for
> devices requesting dma allocations, this uninitialized iovad will
> be used, thereby causing NULL pointer dereference issue.
> 
> Flow:
> - During arm_smmu_device_probe, bus_iommu_probe() will be called
> as part of iommu_device_register(). This results in the device probe,
> __iommu_probe_device().
> 
> - When the modprobe of the client device happens in parallel, it
> sets up the DMA configuration for the device using of_dma_configure_id(),
> which inturn calls iommu_probe_device(). Later, default domain is
> allocated and attached using iommu_alloc_default_domain() and
> __iommu_attach_device() respectively. It then ends up initializing a
> mapping domain(IOVA domain) and rcaches for the device via
> arch_setup_dma_ops()->iommu_setup_dma_ops().
> 
> - Now, in the bus_iommu_probe() path, it again tries to allocate
> a default domain via probe_alloc_default_domain(). This results in
> allocating a new default domain(along with IOVA domain) via
> __iommu_domain_alloc(). However, this newly allocated IOVA domain
> will not be initialized.
> 
> - Now, when the same client device tries dma allocations via
> iommu_dma_alloc(), it ends up accessing the rcaches of the newly
> allocated IOVA domain, which is not initialized. This results
> into NULL pointer dereferencing.
> 
> Fix this issue by adding a check in probe_alloc_default_domain()
> to see if the iommu_group already has a default domain allocated
> and initialized.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # see patch description, fix applicable only for 6.1.y
> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nikhil V <quic_nprakash@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil V <quic_nprakash@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Why RESEND?  What happened to the first send?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23  9:40 [PATCH] iommu: Avoid races around default domain allocations Nikhil V
2024-02-23  9:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH RESEND STABLE v6.1] " Nikhil V
2024-03-04 13:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-03-05  7:31   ` Nikhil V
2024-03-29 10:21     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024030403-self-morality-062e@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_nprakash@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox