[PATCH 5.10 35/42] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

commit 2331fd4a49864e1571b4f50aa3aa1536ed6220d0 upstream.

After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without
updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have
already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and
bb_fragments.

Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead
to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment
length. Hence move the update of bb_free to after the block double-free
check guarantees that the corresponding statistics are updated only after
the core block bitmap is modified.

Fixes: eabe0444df90 ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit")
CC:  <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-5-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1494,11 +1494,6 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
 	mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count);
 
-	this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
-	e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count;
-	if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free)
-		e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first;
-
 	/* access memory sequentially: check left neighbour,
 	 * clear range and then check right neighbour
 	 */
@@ -1512,23 +1507,31 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode
 		struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 		ext4_fsblk_t blocknr;
 
+		/*
+		 * Fastcommit replay can free already freed blocks which
+		 * corrupts allocation info. Regenerate it.
+		 */
+		if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) {
+			mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b);
+			goto check;
+		}
+
 		blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
 		blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block);
-		if (!(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY)) {
-			ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
-					      inode ? inode->i_ino : 0,
-					      blocknr,
-					      "freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.",
-					      block);
-			ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(
-				sb, e4b->bd_group,
+		ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+				      inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, blocknr,
+				      "freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.",
+				      block);
+		ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
 				EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
-		} else {
-			mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b);
-		}
-		goto done;
+		return;
 	}
 
+	this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
+	e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count;
+	if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free)
+		e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first;
+
 	/* let's maintain fragments counter */
 	if (left_is_free && right_is_free)
 		e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--;
@@ -1553,8 +1556,8 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode
 	if (first <= last)
 		mb_buddy_mark_free(e4b, first >> 1, last >> 1);
 
-done:
 	mb_set_largest_free_order(sb, e4b->bd_info);
+check:
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
 }