From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "wifi: wilc1000: revert reset line logic flip" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:47:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024032335-overdress-tinkling-e886@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c87bc80-c4e4-4a7d-a1d4-c2f90ffbe791@bootlin.com>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:07:39AM +0100, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 3/22/24 19:17, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >
> > wifi: wilc1000: revert reset line logic flip
> >
> > to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> >
> > The filename of the patch is:
> > wifi-wilc1000-revert-reset-line-logic-flip.patch
> > and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.
> >
> > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> > please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>
> This patch is expected to introduce a breakage on platforms using a wrong device
> tree description. After discussing this consequence with wireless and DT people
> (see this patch RFC in [1]), it has been decided that this is tolerable. However,
> despite the Fixes tag I have put in the patch, I am not sure it is OK to also
> introduce this breakage for people just updating their stable kernels ? My
> opinion here is that they should get this break only when updating to a new
> kernel release, not stable, so I _would_ keep this patch out of stable trees
> (currently applied to 6.1, 6.6, 6.7 and 6.8, if I have followed correctly).
No one should ever have anything "break" no matter if they update from a
normal release, or a stable release, so this is not a thing. Either it
is ok for any release, or none, and needs to be reverted.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-23 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240322181725.114042-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-23 10:07 ` Patch "wifi: wilc1000: revert reset line logic flip" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree Alexis Lothoré
2024-03-23 16:47 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024032335-overdress-tinkling-e886@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ajay.kathat@microchip.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox