From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.8 01/11] Revert "workqueue: Shorten events_freezable_power_efficient name"
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:55:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240403175125.807427157@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403175125.754099419@linuxfoundation.org>
6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit fb89c8fa412f6caa34316c140e861bd3c4d7e83a which is
commit 8318d6a6362f5903edb4c904a8dd447e59be4ad1 upstream
The workqueue patches backported to 6.8.y caused some reported
regressions, so revert them for now.
Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ce4c2f67-c298-48a0-87a3-f933d646c73b@leemhuis.info/
Cc: Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -7186,7 +7186,7 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void)
WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);
system_power_efficient_wq = alloc_workqueue("events_power_efficient",
WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT, 0);
- system_freezable_power_efficient_wq = alloc_workqueue("events_freezable_pwr_efficient",
+ system_freezable_power_efficient_wq = alloc_workqueue("events_freezable_power_efficient",
WQ_FREEZABLE | WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT,
0);
BUG_ON(!system_wq || !system_highpri_wq || !system_long_wq ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 17:55 [PATCH 6.8 00/11] 6.8.4-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 02/11] Revert "workqueue: Dont call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 03/11] Revert "workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 04/11] Revert "workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 05/11] Revert "workqueue: RCU protect wq->dfl_pwq and implement accessors for it" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 06/11] Revert "workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 07/11] Revert "workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 08/11] Revert "workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 09/11] Revert "workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty()" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 10/11] Revert "workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 17:55 ` [PATCH 6.8 11/11] Revert "workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-03 23:00 ` [PATCH 6.8 00/11] 6.8.4-rc1 review Shuah Khan
2024-04-04 3:21 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-04-04 7:05 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-04 8:03 ` Ron Economos
2024-04-04 8:24 ` Luna Jernberg
2024-04-04 10:00 ` Jon Hunter
2024-04-04 12:10 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-04 16:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-04-04 20:19 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240403175125.807427157@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=audra@redhat.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).