From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDE2152DF0 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712168315; cv=none; b=jnYXk6q9BoG7O2q6Roa7CU4gwnB84D5+dKROYhB8f57pyvwvOGZ2UVsu8bsl9vd2Xyh57fj/a6r3LaLSHaPzG9nPCa44pM4DlmzKSZmp1eaJJBYaU0RdW4XsILIddMJ4qE0jDRCR4dhkj5dLKIr+kTDReDAtumbDXc4qwyNrGmc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712168315; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P9yWqBtlsaeFnaAZmbCkgpReXKzLQLMYUfBreeUNjr4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KSjhYBM0RwwVwrBnjXm0siC0WwqbQ3LDV52KsncrH2xvABZOghF4gQIwmmhPhN/f1BJ+4p5Eiywf8eJ3IL/SQyTc87HGxZu9ZAOzL3zGARI9MgTWYF/S7iXHj+Zybq4mVkINb4aszbJQSUZet4qVXW1t+RCQWFqNWb/k3/BD2YY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MSj7+4gu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MSj7+4gu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12AC9C433F1; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:18:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712168315; bh=P9yWqBtlsaeFnaAZmbCkgpReXKzLQLMYUfBreeUNjr4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MSj7+4gu1ie54nAa9tpG/7XYqz6LKMWtzj7Zo9MOgrnnr8DptCtNNmJE+ejzrDqHH YoCFJyHRpdAAiDU+unF9K2GqrCZRGkGB3RmZaxsqJLcHUV7rhf8YaWcTxdZwHqX50r VouPXAkYnbwPm9RD4OewmUCjvBinGy1mOedPl//UrTjIynADlD/dTerXr/Ddtvqste N4LX736jN+RL9z6PoQgAp6PllalT6rAWdArWFLgPdh5ECJjOTfbAqdhVKQRDXVgnqL JPAKSjS4yjeZU3tZQL5mW+vyFboaE1oE3OfMLiuxyaWQPd4qjSRfRvh8ZoHtuvLjG6 on6ttJ04ypFkQ== Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:18:34 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Mahmoud Adam Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein , Leah Rumancik , Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/6] backport xfs fix patches reported by xfs/179/270/557/606 Message-ID: <20240403181834.GA6414@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20240403125949.33676-1-mngyadam@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240403125949.33676-1-mngyadam@amazon.com> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Mahmoud Adam wrote: > Hi, > > These patches fix and reported by xfstests tests xfs/179 xfs/270 > xfs/557 xfs/606, the patchset were tested to confirm they fix those > tests. all are clean picks. Hi! Thanks for the backports! Normally I'd pass these on to the 6.1 XFS maintainer, but I'm not sure who's actually taking care of that at the moment. To find out, I've cc'd all the people who have either sent 6.1 backports or made noises about doing so. To the group: Who's the appropriate person to handle these? Mahmoud: If the answer to the above is "???" or silence, would you be willing to take on stable testing and maintenance? Also FYI the normal practice (I think) is to cc linux-xfs, pick up some acks, and then resend with the acks and cc'd to stable. The six patches you sent along look ok to me, so Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong --D > thanks, > MNAdam